the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
HAMSOM-VICE v0.9: Comparison of two variable ice-ocean drag coefficient parameterizations on annual simulations of Bohai Sea ice
Abstract. This study compares the simulation performance of two ice-ocean drag coefficient parameterizations (Scheme1 (original scheme): large-scale roughness parameterization, Scheme2 (newly introduced scheme): small-scale geometric roughness parameterization) for the Bohai sea ice in the 2011/2012 ice season, revealing main component of the ice-ocean drag coefficient (Cdw) and its crucial regulatory role in sea ice dynamic-thermodynamic processes in the Bohai Sea. The findings demonstrate that, for the ice-ocean drag in the thin ice environment of the Bohai Sea, the ice-bottom surface skin drag and the ice floe edge form drag dominate, while the contribution of ice keel-related drag is negligible due to insufficient ice thickness (averaging 20–30 cm). Scheme2 reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) of daily total ice area by 28 % compared to the Scheme1, showing higher simulation accuracy in the overall spatiotemporal ice evolution in the Bohai Sea. While Scheme1 demonstrates closer agreement with the observed length of ice season (underestimating by only 7 days). The result analysis of key sea ice variables and ice-ocean interfacial variables indicates that Cdw can affect the ice velocity through the dynamic feedback mechanism, and the basal freezing/melting through the thermodynamic dual feedback mechanisms.
- Preprint
(2570 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 28 Feb 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4290', Ian Brooks, 02 Feb 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-4290/egusphere-2025-4290-RC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-4290-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Libang Xu, 07 Feb 2026
reply
Dear Prof. Brooks,
Thank you for your detailed and insightful comments. We are carefully reviewing and deliberating on each of your suggestions, and a small amount of additional time is needed for internal discussions and data verification to develop a thorough revision plan and supplementary analyses. We aim to submit a detailed preliminary response within the next 3–5 days. We appreciate your patience and understanding greatly.
Sincerely,
The Authors of HAMSOM-VICE v0.9
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4290-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Libang Xu, 07 Feb 2026
reply
Model code and software
HAMSOM-VICE_compile_and_running Bin Jia and Libang Xu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17063555
Matlab_sea_ice_plotting_script Libang Xu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17061378
HAMSOM-VICE-result-data-processing-code Bin Jia and Libang Xu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17060999
The HAMSOM-VICE sea ice model based on Small-scale roughness drag coefficient parameterization, scheme2 Jan O. Backhaus, Maier Reimer, Bernhard Mayer, Bin Jia, Libang Xu, Yu Liu, Xue'en Chen, and Donglin Guo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17054276
The HAMSOM-VICE sea ice model based on Large-scale roughness drag coefficient parameterization, scheme1 Jan O. Backhaus, Maier Reimer, Bernhard Mayer, Bin Jia, Libang Xu, Yu Liu, Xue'en Chen, and Donglin Guo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17054212
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 187 | 71 | 26 | 284 | 27 | 24 |
- HTML: 187
- PDF: 71
- XML: 26
- Total: 284
- BibTeX: 27
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1