the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Resolving the roles of soot and dust in cirrus cloud ice formation at regional and global scales: insights from parcel and climate models
Abstract. Atmospheric aerosols can serve as ice-nucleating particles (INPs), influencing the formation and properties of cirrus clouds. While mineral dust has long been considered an effective INP, the role of soot particles remains less explored, limiting our ability to assess their climate impact. Here we use cloud parcel model simulations to examine the competitive ice nucleation behavior of soot and dust, alongside homogeneous nucleation, under a range of meteorological conditions. These simulations provide process-level insights into how soot and dust influence cirrus cloud ice formation. To evaluate their large-scale implications, we integrate these results into the GFDL AM4-MG2 global climate model. We find that on the global scale, soot (represented in the model as black carbon, BC) enhance ice crystal number concentration by ~5 %. However, regional increases are much larger – up to 90 % in the upper troposphere (500–250 hPa). The strongest enhancements are observed during boreal spring across Eurasia and the Maritime Continent, and during austral spring over South America and the South Atlantic. The radiative impacts of BC INPs are also substantial. They enhance the annual global cloud radiative effect in the longwave spectrum by approximately 0.24 W m-2 and contribute to statistically significant net warming effect during the polar winter in both hemispheres. These results highlight the distinct roles of soot and dust in cloud ice formation and underscore the need to assess the impacts of rising wildfire emissions on atmospheric ice processes and associated climate effects.
- Preprint
(19769 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4224', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Nov 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4224', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Nov 2025
This study uses a parcel model to find relationships on the competition between homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation based upon a large variety of black carbon and dust concentration. The resulting findings are inserted into the GFDL AM4-MG2 model to examine how black carbon and mineral dust impacts cirrus clouds globally. Black carbon enhances global ice crystal number concentration and significantly increases the annual global longwave cloud radiative effect, causing warming, particularly during polar winters. The results emphasize the roles of soot and dust and the need to assess the climate impact of increasing wildfire emissions on atmospheric ice processes. The paper is very well written, and conclusions are well supported. I have only minor comments.
In the abstract, line 8: I like to reserve the word observe to real observations. I wonder if the sentence could be rephrased to something like “The strongest enhancements are found during boreal”
Page 4, lines 118-123: The diameters and standard deviations of the aerosol size distribution are fixed. Could varying the size and shape of the size distributions change your results?
Page 5, line 147: Add “of” ….where N_aer is the number density of ice nucleating….
Page 7, line 199. It is stated that the AMIP simulation is run through 2006. Why is the analysis period only to 2005 and not through 2006?
Page 7, line 209. ICNC has only been defined in the abstract, but not in the main text yet.
Section 3.1.2 You describe the ICNC dependence on aerosol composition. But there is no mention about the competition between homogeneous and heterogeneous dependence on aerosol composition. I am not sure how to present it, but it would be interesting to have a figure showing how the change in composition impacts homogeneous freezing.
Page 11, Figure 3. The In-situ Heymsfield symbols are difficult to see, special in the green region. The dotted lines could also be slightly enhanced. It would also be interesting to see how the model performs without the BC in this figure.
Conclusion: Lines 480-485. The authors have based their conclusion on one dust and BC parameterization. There are other parameterizations out there that can lead to different results. For example, how is the temperature dependent active site density in other parameterizations and how could this impact the results?
Figures 5 and 8 are very small and hard to read on printed paper.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4224-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,620 | 51 | 11 | 1,682 | 14 | 14 |
- HTML: 1,620
- PDF: 51
- XML: 11
- Total: 1,682
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 14
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This paper examines the roles of soot (black carbon, BC) and mineral dust as ice-nucleating particles (INPs) in shaping cirrus cloud properties and their global radiative impacts. The authors first use a cloud parcel model to perform 5.5 million simulations under a wide range of conditions, including variations in cloud-base temperature, pressure, updraft velocity, and aerosol (dust, soot, sulfate, and sea salt) mass concentrations. These simulations provide process-level insights into how soot and dust influence ice formation in cirrus clouds. The results are then incorporated into a global climate model to assess large-scale effects. The study finds that soot increases global mean ice crystal number concentration (ICNC) by about 5%, with regional enhancements of up to 90% in the upper troposphere. Furthermore, BC INPs strengthen the global longwave cloud radiative effect and lead to a statistically significant net warming during polar winters in both hemispheres. Overall, I appreciate the comprehensive simulations and analyses conducted by the authors. The results might provide valuable insights into the influence of BC INPs on cirrus cloud formation and radiative forcing at both global and regional scales. However, I think major revisions are needed to especially clarify the model configuration so that readers can better understand and assess the simulation results.
Major comments:
Minor comments: