the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Retrievals of vertically resolved aerosol microphysical particle parameters with regularization from spaceborne Aerosol and Carbon dioxide Detection Lidar (ACDL)
Abstract. Using an improved regularization method, we attempt to derive microphysical parameters (effective radius ðððð, surface area concentration ððĄ, volume concentration ððĄ) of aerosol particle size distribution directly from the detection results of Aerosol and Carbon dioxide Detection Lidar (ACDL), which is the first spaceborne high spectral resolution lidar. The backscatter and extinction coefficients at 532 nm, 1064 nm, 1572 nm are adopted for regularization algorithm. Preliminary simulations for different aerosol types demonstrate the algorithm performance of the 3α+3β optical data combination. For monomodal aerosols, the retrieval errors are constrained within 15 % for ðððð, 30 % for ððĄ, and 35 % for ððĄ. In bimodal cases, errors increase to 18–35 % for ðððð, 35 % for ððĄ, and up to 60 % for ððĄ. Sensitivity analysis confirms that systematic errors of ±20 % in input optical data induce parameter uncertainties below 60 %. Case studies reveal four typical aerosols profiles: urban (ðððð~0.5 μm), smoke (ðððð~0.6 μm), dust (ðððð~0.65 μm), and marine (ðððð~0.85 μm). The inversion ðððð is compared with CALIPSO and LIVAS, which confirms high consistency for marine and dust, while urban and smoke retrievals show slightly larger. The inclusion of 1572 nm significantly enhances coarse-mode retrieval accuracy. The error statistics of the simulations and the actual comparison results show that the proposed inversion algorithm can reliably derive the particle size distribution parameters from the spaceborne multi-wavelength lidar ACDL. This work provides preliminary validation of ACDL's capability to retrieve vertically resolved global aerosol microphysical characterization.
- Preprint
(1831 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 27 Oct 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4208', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Sep 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', ziyu Bi, 22 Sep 2025
reply
Thanks for your comments. We fully agree that the quality of the input data is necessary and the method that calculate backscattering and extinctio should be explained. The detailed responses to the comments are in the attached file.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', ziyu Bi, 22 Sep 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,391 | 16 | 6 | 1,413 | 14 | 13 |
- HTML: 1,391
- PDF: 16
- XML: 6
- Total: 1,413
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Authors analyze possibility to retrieve the particle size distribution from the measurements of space based HSRL lidar, using inversion with regularization. Lidar perform measurements at 3 wavelengths 532 nm, 1064 nm, 1572 nm and authors assume that 3 backscattering and 3 extinction coefficients are available.
This inversion technique is widely used for ground based lidars, but it is really a challenge to use it for satellite measurements. The main problem is to provide high quality of input data, because measurements from space are characterized by high noise. So, anybody, who tries to present such inversion, first of all should demonstrate profiles of aerosol backscattering and extinction coefficients with corresponding uncertainties. This is what I miss in this manuscript. Authors should explain how they calculate backscattering and extinction at 1064 and 1572 nm. I could also provide other comments, but question about input data quality is the main. I think, without it manuscript cannot be published.