Preprints
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1892797/v2
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1892797/v2
11 Mar 2025
 | 11 Mar 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Northern Hemisphere Stratospheric Temperature Response to External Forcing in Decadal Climate Simulations

Abdullah A. Fahad, Andrea Molod, Krzysztof Wargan, Dimitris Menemenlis, Patrick Heimbach, Atanas Trayanov, Ehud Strobach, and Lawrence Coy

Abstract. To predict the future state of the earth system on multiyear timescales, it is crucial to understand the response to the changing external radiative forcing (CO2 and Ozone). In this study, we use a 1-degree GEOS-MITgcm coupled general circulation model to understand the response to different levels of observed external forcing from past decades. Results from an ensemble of multi-year forecasts show the Northern Hemisphere polar stratospheric temperature increased during the period from 1992 to 2000, and decreased during 2000 to 2020. To isolate the influence of external forcing, 30-year long ensemble 'perpetual' experiments were conducted in which the external forcing for a particular year is repeated, for 1992, 2000, and 2020. Each simulated year of these perpetual experiments is forced with the CO2, Ozone, anthropogenic aerosol emissions, and trace gases of that year but does not include any explosive volcanic forcing. This temperature increase from 1992 to 2000 is in contrast to the general expectation that the stratosphere cools as CO2 increases. The increasing and then decreasing temperature trend is also manifest in several reanalyses, and CMIP6 historical simulations with a well-resolved stratosphere. Results rules out either a response to volcanic emissions or a change in the phase of decadal modes of variability as an explanation for the warming. Analysis of the temperature budget showed that the behavior of the polar stratospheric temperature is dictated by the meridional eddy transport of heat as a result of changes in CO2 and Ozone in the past decades.

Share
Abdullah A. Fahad, Andrea Molod, Krzysztof Wargan, Dimitris Menemenlis, Patrick Heimbach, Atanas Trayanov, Ehud Strobach, and Lawrence Coy

Status: open (until 22 Apr 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Abdullah A. Fahad, Andrea Molod, Krzysztof Wargan, Dimitris Menemenlis, Patrick Heimbach, Atanas Trayanov, Ehud Strobach, and Lawrence Coy
Abdullah A. Fahad, Andrea Molod, Krzysztof Wargan, Dimitris Menemenlis, Patrick Heimbach, Atanas Trayanov, Ehud Strobach, and Lawrence Coy

Viewed

Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.

Total article views: 49 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
49 0 0 49 0 0
  • HTML: 49
  • PDF: 0
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 49
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.

Total article views: 51 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 51 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
This study used a 1-degree GEOS-MITgcm coupled GCM to analyze the Northern Hemisphere (NH) stratospheric temperature response to external forcing. Results show the NH polar stratospheric temperature increased from 1992 to 2000, contrary to the expectation of stratospheric cooling with rising CO2. However, from 2000 to 2020, the temperature decreased. The study concluded that changes in CO2 and Ozone drive the meridional eddy transport of heat, dictating polar stratospheric temperature behavior.
Share