Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4164
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4164
04 Oct 2025
 | 04 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).

Case-to-Case Variability in the Tropospheric Response to Sudden Stratospheric Warmings Revealed by Ensemble Re-Forecasts

Sheena Loeffel, Philip Rupp, Selina Kiefer, Joaquim G. Pinto, Thomas Birner, and Hella Garny

Abstract. Stratospheric extreme events during Northern winter and spring have been shown to sometimes enhance the subseasonal predictability of large-scale tropospheric circulation patterns such as the North Atlantic oscillation (NAO) and Greenland/European blocking. We aim to quantify the highly variable downward influence of sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) events on the troposphere in numerical simulations. With this aim, we construct a model climatology using the ICON global numerical weather prediction (NWP) model consisting of possible realistic stratosphere-troposphere evolutions of the coupled troposphere-stratosphere system during winter months. The resulting simulations demonstrate clear stratosphere-troposphere coupling, consistent with observational findings from previous studies. Ensemble re-forecasts, centred around selected SSW events, reveal significant variability in surface responses and robustly show that on average across SSW events, the lower stratosphere serves as a mediator between the upper/mid-stratosphere and the tropospheric flow. We show that the mean tropospheric response to SSWs based on composites and ensemble re-forecasts is heavily case dependent and ties in with the strength of the lower stratospheric anomaly. Our results establish an increased likelihood of developing Greenland blocking with an anomalous lower stratospheric evolution. Moreover, we present indications that the height of wave reflection surfaces can be decisive in establishing persistent lower-stratospheric anomalies and the associated tropospheric response. Overall, we show that individual SSW events differ significantly in their likelihood to induce a canonical tropospheric response, and this likelihood can be predicted at the onset of the SSW.

Competing interests: Thomas Birner is a member of the editorial board of WCD.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sheena Loeffel, Philip Rupp, Selina Kiefer, Joaquim G. Pinto, Thomas Birner, and Hella Garny

Status: open (until 15 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sheena Loeffel, Philip Rupp, Selina Kiefer, Joaquim G. Pinto, Thomas Birner, and Hella Garny
Sheena Loeffel, Philip Rupp, Selina Kiefer, Joaquim G. Pinto, Thomas Birner, and Hella Garny
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
We use a dedicated simulation setup to shed light on the question whether, and why, some sudden stratospheric warming events are more likely than others to develop a surface response. We find that the propensity for downward coupling is unique to each event, and that from day one, the chance of a lower-stratospheric response can be predicted – a key step toward anticipating the surface response, moving beyond 'random' surface outcomes to quantified likelihoods of the ensuing surface response.
Share