Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4148
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4148
04 Sep 2025
 | 04 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Higher tree diversity reduces critical slowing down in the Amazon forest

Johanna Van Passel, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Paulo N. Bernardino, Wanda De Keersmaecker, Stef Lhermitte, Bianca F. Rius, and Ben Somers

Abstract. The Amazon forest is influenced by strong feedback loops between its biotic and abiotic components. Local forest loss increases CO2 emissions, which, in turn, drives climate change, raising temperatures and reducing rainfall, causing further forest loss. Additionally, forest loss disrupts important forest-rainfall cycles, threatening the overall forest stability. These feedbacks make the system vulnerable to tipping points, where parts of the forest could transition to a degraded state. Critical slowing down is an early warning indicator for approaching tipping points, as it indicates slower recovery to short-term disturbances. However, the role of tree species diversity in this process is yet to be clarified. Furthermore, it is highly uncertain how the relation between tree species diversity and critical slowing down varies with spatial scales. To examine how tree species diversity impacts critical slowing down across multiple spatial scales, we used modelled tree species diversity data at the alpha (local), beta (asynchrony across local communities), and gamma (regional) scales. We quantified critical slowing down on the same scales using temporal autocorrelation trends in monthly satellite-derived vegetation productivity time series over 2001–2019. Our findings reveal more pronounced slowing down at the alpha level (25 km²) compared to the gamma level (209,903 km²), indicating that Amazonian tipping points are more likely to occur locally than regionally or basin-wide. We also observe significant but weak positive linear relationships between tree species diversity and stability at both alpha and beta scales. This emphasizes both the importance of biodiversity conservation at multiple spatial scales and the complexity of understanding the stability of the Amazon forest.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Johanna Van Passel, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Paulo N. Bernardino, Wanda De Keersmaecker, Stef Lhermitte, Bianca F. Rius, and Ben Somers

Status: open (until 16 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Johanna Van Passel, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Paulo N. Bernardino, Wanda De Keersmaecker, Stef Lhermitte, Bianca F. Rius, and Ben Somers
Johanna Van Passel, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Paulo N. Bernardino, Wanda De Keersmaecker, Stef Lhermitte, Bianca F. Rius, and Ben Somers

Viewed

Total article views: 57 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
57 0 0 57 0 0
  • HTML: 57
  • PDF: 0
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 57
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 57 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 57 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
The Amazon forest is important for carbon storage, but climate change might push parts of it towards a tipping point into a degraded state. By studying satellite trends and tree diversity across different spatial scales, we found a larger tipping risk at smaller spatial scales than for the whole region. We also found that higher tree diversity makes the forest more stable and thus less likely to tip, although the effect is relatively weak, highlighting the importance of protecting biodiversity.
Share