Estimating the Thermodynamic Contribution to Recent Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Loss
Abstract. The Greenland Ice Sheet has become the largest single frozen source of global sea level rise following a pronounced increase in meltwater runoff in recent decades. The pivotal role of anomalous anticyclonic circulation patterns in facilitating this increase has been widely documented; however, this change in atmospheric circulation has coincided with a rapidly warming Arctic. While amplified warming at high latitudes has undoubtedly contributed to trends in Greenland's mass loss, the contribution of this shift in background conditions relative to changes in regional circulation patterns has yet to be quantified. Here, we apply the pseudo-global warming method of dynamical downscaling to estimate the contribution of the change in the thermodynamic background state under global warming to observed Greenland Ice Sheet surface mass loss since the turn of the century. Our analysis demonstrates that, had the recent atmospheric dynamical forcing of the Greenland Ice Sheet occurred under a preindustrial setting, anomalous surface mass loss would have been reduced by over 62 % relative to observations. We show that the change in the thermodynamic environment under amplified Arctic warming has augmented melt of the ice sheet via longwave radiative effects accompanying an increase in atmospheric water vapor content. Furthermore, the thermodynamic contribution to surface mass loss over the exceptional melt years of 2012 and 2019 was less than half that of the long-term average, demonstrating a reduced influence during periods of strong synoptic-scale atmospheric forcing.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of The Cryosphere.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
General remarks
This is an excellent and novel quantitative analysis of the contribution of the local change in background thermodynamic contribution to the Greenland Ice Sheet surface mass balance loss. It effectively separates out the role of sea-surface temperature and sea-ice concentration forcing, which is found (corroborating some but not all previous studies) to be relatively minor. A valuable analysis of the extreme melt case studies of 2012 and 2019, and the difference in terms of climatic forcing between these events, is provided. The analysis is thorough and the paper is clearly written. It will be of wide interest to Greenland climate scientists and ice-sheet specialists. I recommend publication following a minor revision addressing the points below.
Specific comments
Line 26: please add the following recent relevant references:
Otosaka et al. (2023) https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/15/1597/2023/
Hanna et al. (2024) https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-023-00509-7#publish-with-us
Figure 1: define PGW-1, PGW-2 etc. I the figure caption.
Lines 167-179: please add that while GCMs may capture the periodicity of internal climate variability they may not capture the magnitude of such variability. Will taking the CESM-LE ensemble mean be affected by signal-to-noise issues with the GCMs in capturing North Atlantic circulation change?
l.201: Are there issues with the accuracy of prescribed SIC and SST for 1880-1899 that may affected the method used?
ll.252 & 480: please add the following highly relevant reference:
Hanna et al. (2021) https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/joc.6771
The green and blue lines on some plots look a bit similar; could they be distinguished more clearly?
l.496: please add the following highly relevant reference to “more persistent circulation regimes under global warming”:
Overland et al. (2012) https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2012GL053268