the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Bedrock ledges, colluvial wedges, and ridgetop water towers: Characterizing geomorphic and atmospheric controls on the 2023 Wrangell landslide to inform landslide assessment in Southeast Alaska, USA
Abstract. In the past decade, several fatal landslides have impacted Southeast Alaska, highlighting the need to advance our understanding of regional geomorphic and atmospheric controls on triggering events and runout behaviour. A large and long runout landslide on Wrangell Island, with area in the top 0.5 % of >14,760 slides mapped in the Tongass National Forest, initiated during an atmospheric river event in November 2023 and travelled >1 km downslope, causing six fatalities. We used field observations, sequential airborne lidar, geotechnical analyses, and climate data to characterize the geomorphic, hydrologic, and atmospheric conditions contributing to the landslide. Rainfall intensities recorded at the Wrangell airport were modest (~1-yr recurrence interval), but rapid snowmelt and drainage from a ridgetop wetland may have contributed to rapid saturation of the landslide. Although strong winds were recorded, we did not observe extensive windthrow, which may downgrade its contribution to slope failure. The landslide mobilized a steep, thick (>4 m) wedge of colluvium that accumulated below a resistant bedrock ledge and entrained additional colluvial deposits as it travelled downslope across cliff-bench topography. The substantial entrainment resulted in an unusually large width, extensive runout, and low depositional slope as the landslide terminated in the coastal environment. Our results suggest that the sequencing of rain- and snow-dominated storms, geologic controls on post-glacial colluvium production and accumulation, and ridgetop hydrology contributed to landslide initiation and mobility. Advances in post-glacial landscape evolution models, frequent lidar acquisition, and additional climate data are needed to inform regional landslide hazard assessment.
- Preprint
(8162 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(755 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4123', Joshua Roering, 22 Sep 2025
This submitted version does not currently cite these data source references. They will be incorporated during the revision process.
- Zechmann, J. M., Wikstrom Jones, K. M., and Wolken, G. J.: Lidar-derived elevation data for Wrangell Island, Southeast Alaska, collected July 2023, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, https://doi.org/10.14509/31098, 2023.
- Zechmann, J. M., Wikstrom Jones, K. M., and Wolken, G. J.: Lidar-derived elevation data for Wrangell Island, Southeast Alaska, collected November 28-29, 2023, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, https://doi.org/10.14509/31106, 2024.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4123-AC1 -
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4123', Bill Burns, 27 Oct 2025
The paper is very well written and the authors do a great job investigating and describing the details of what happened.
I have a couple of comments that I think should be mentioned in the paper. The wind. You related the wind to mechanical components like tree throw, but I don't think you mention the wind as an effect on the snow melt. See our DOGAMI SP-55 where we discuss the role of winds in snow melting. The combination of high wind and air temperature increase at the same time can significantly contribute to snow melting and melting rate. The wind blows the warm air into the snow which contributes to the snow melt. We talked with Ben Hatchett about this. If you look at your graph, the wind and air temperature seem to correlate both high in the time right before the landslide initiates. It is always very hard to say what exactly happened, but I think this is worth mentioning. Is there any way to know how much snow was on the ground days before the event? Even if it was neighbors or roads crews guess. This can clearly affect the terrestrial water input (TWI) above the initiation area, but also how much snow was on the benches? The snow on the benches could play a role in the saturation of the colluvium on the benches. Was there snow on the benches which also underwent rapid melt? I bring this up, because of the lack of likelihood of water from the top of the mountain flowing down the anti-dipping beds and benches and thus not a likely source of saturation of the bench colluvium, which leaves rain from antecedent moisture, rain from this event, and snowmelt all three needing to be directly onto the benches.
Again, really nice paper, authors! This will help Alaskans understand and reduce risk to debris flows.
Bill Burns
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4123-RC1 -
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Joshua Roering, 05 Nov 2025
The reviewer's comment about the role of wind and warm air contributing to the snowmelt is an excellent one. We will dig into the relevant references and add text into the results and discussion section that assesses this potential contribution in the context of the climate data figure. In particular, this mechanism is not well understood or appreciated beyond the snow hydrology community so this is a good opportunity to lay out the concept and refer to previous work.
In terms of the existing snowpack prior to the event, it would have been extensive on those benched landforms according to the multiple residents/hunters that we chatted with during our community meetings. In that sense, the colluvial wedges likely experienced high saturation owing to that source. our hydrologic flowpaths do show that the cross-slope tilt also contributes to downslope transmission of subsurface stormflow from upslope but parsing out the relevance importance of these two sources is difficult. Overall, this is another excellent comment and we will add relevant text to the revised manuscript.Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4123-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Joshua Roering, 05 Nov 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4123', Jürgen Mey, 30 Oct 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-4123/egusphere-2025-4123-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Joshua Roering, 05 Nov 2025
Many thanks for the well stated summary and assessment of the manuscript.Â
The comments regarding defining MP in the text and NF in the figure are readily achieved. Thanks for catching those!
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4123-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Joshua Roering, 05 Nov 2025
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,425 | 96 | 25 | 1,546 | 29 | 24 | 24 |
- HTML: 1,425
- PDF: 96
- XML: 25
- Total: 1,546
- Supplement: 29
- BibTeX: 24
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1