Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4095
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4095
02 Sep 2025
 | 02 Sep 2025

Comparison of noise levels of different magnetometer types and space environments

Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke

Abstract. The plasma environment around Earth has markedly different characteristics of the magnetic field across distinct spatial regions. In the solar wind, beyond Earth's magnetic influence, the magnetic field is relatively low and less fluctuating. In contrast, the magnetosheath – the region between the bow shock and the magnetopause – is characterized by significantly more turbulent magnetic fields. Within the magnetosphere, the magnetic field can go up to tens of thousands of nanotesla (nT). Traditionally, 5 fluxgate magnetometers have been the standard instrument for space-based magnetic field measurements. However, in recent years, alternative technologies such as anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) sensors and optically pumped magnetometers have been proposed and, in some cases, deployed. This study compares the noise performances of two magnetometers, a fluxgate and an AMR, by evaluating their amplitude spectral density measurements across various near-Earth regions of space. The potential of each sensor type for investigating specific phenomena is also evaluated.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

08 Dec 2025
Comparison of noise levels of two magnetometer types and their suitability for different space environments
Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 14, 447–458, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-447-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-447-2025, 2025
Short summary
Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4095', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Oct 2025
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Gerlinde Timmermann, 10 Nov 2025
      • AC3: 'Reply on AC2', Gerlinde Timmermann, 10 Nov 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4095', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Oct 2025
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Gerlinde Timmermann, 30 Oct 2025

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4095', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Oct 2025
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Gerlinde Timmermann, 10 Nov 2025
      • AC3: 'Reply on AC2', Gerlinde Timmermann, 10 Nov 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4095', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Oct 2025
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Gerlinde Timmermann, 30 Oct 2025

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Gerlinde Timmermann on behalf of the Authors (10 Nov 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (19 Nov 2025) by Valery Korepanov
AR by Gerlinde Timmermann on behalf of the Authors (19 Nov 2025)

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

08 Dec 2025
Comparison of noise levels of two magnetometer types and their suitability for different space environments
Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 14, 447–458, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-447-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-447-2025, 2025
Short summary
Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke
Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke

Viewed

Total article views: 882 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
730 131 21 882 31 38
  • HTML: 730
  • PDF: 131
  • XML: 21
  • Total: 882
  • BibTeX: 31
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 868 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 868 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Dec 2025
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
We've compared the amplitude spectral densities of a fluxgate magnetometer (FGM) and an anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) magnetometer during ground testing with the amplitude spectral densities obtained in different regions of near-Earth space. The FGM can measure the fields in the different space regions and their fluctuations within a frequency range of 1 mHz to 2.5 Hz. The AMR magnetometer is only suitable for more turbulent regions such as the magnetosheath due to its higher noise levels.
Share