Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4095
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4095
02 Sep 2025
 | 02 Sep 2025

Comparison of noise levels of different magnetometer types and space environments

Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke

Abstract. The plasma environment around Earth has markedly different characteristics of the magnetic field across distinct spatial regions. In the solar wind, beyond Earth's magnetic influence, the magnetic field is relatively low and less fluctuating. In contrast, the magnetosheath – the region between the bow shock and the magnetopause – is characterized by significantly more turbulent magnetic fields. Within the magnetosphere, the magnetic field can go up to tens of thousands of nanotesla (nT). Traditionally, 5 fluxgate magnetometers have been the standard instrument for space-based magnetic field measurements. However, in recent years, alternative technologies such as anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) sensors and optically pumped magnetometers have been proposed and, in some cases, deployed. This study compares the noise performances of two magnetometers, a fluxgate and an AMR, by evaluating their amplitude spectral density measurements across various near-Earth regions of space. The potential of each sensor type for investigating specific phenomena is also evaluated.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4095', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Oct 2025
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Gerlinde Timmermann, 10 Nov 2025
      • AC3: 'Reply on AC2', Gerlinde Timmermann, 10 Nov 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4095', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Oct 2025
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Gerlinde Timmermann, 30 Oct 2025
Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke
Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke

Viewed

Total article views: 785 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
705 64 16 785 28 34
  • HTML: 705
  • PDF: 64
  • XML: 16
  • Total: 785
  • BibTeX: 28
  • EndNote: 34
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 776 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 776 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
We've compared the amplitude spectral densities of a fluxgate magnetometer (FGM) and an anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) magnetometer during ground testing with the amplitude spectral densities obtained in different regions of near-Earth space. The FGM can measure the fields in the different space regions and their fluctuations within a frequency range of 1 mHz to 2.5 Hz. The AMR magnetometer is only suitable for more turbulent regions such as the magnetosheath due to its higher noise levels.
Share