the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
From Farm to Planet: The InSEEDS World-Earth Model for Simulating Transitions to Regenerative Agriculture
Abstract. Industrialised agriculture and its externalisation of environmental costs have contributed to accelerating ecological degradation and the transgression of planetary boundaries. Vice versa, agriculture is increasingly affected by ecological pressures such as climate change. While sustainable approaches like Regenerative Agriculture offer promising alternatives, most studies focus on the biophysical impacts of individual practices and overlook the complex dynamics underlying their large-scale adoption. In particular, the roles of social-ecological feedbacks, tipping dynamics, and transformative change remain underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce the InSEEDS integrated World-Earth model – a novel co-evolutionary approach to simulating agricultural transitions that couples a process-based vegetation model (LPJmL) with an agent-based model of farmer decision-making. InSEEDS integrates socio-cultural, social-ecological, and biophysical dynamics and can be applied from local to global scales. Distinguishing between a traditionalist and pioneer farmer types, we analyse the adoption dynamics of conservation tillage as a key practice of Regenerative Agriculture. We find that social networks, ecological heterogeneity, and decision-making inertia play a critical role in determining transition dynamics. Adoption of conservation tillage yields overall positive effects on soil carbon and crop yield, though outcomes are strongly context-dependent. InSEEDS provides a foundational tool that opens up avenues for understanding complex human-environment interactions in land-use transformations and advancing the next generation of World-Earth models.
Competing interests: Some authors are members of the editorial board of Earth System Dynamics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(4807 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(258 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 13 Dec 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4079', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Nov 2025
reply
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Nov 2025
reply
Please excuse: The subsection numbers got messed up while copying. It should be, according to the ESD review criteria:
- Relevance to ESD Scope
- Novel Concepts, Ideas, Tools, or Data
- Substantial Conclusions
- Scientific Methods and Assumptions
- Results Supporting Interpretations and Conclusions
- Reproducibility
- Credit to Related Work
- Title Clarity
- Abstract
- Structure and Presentation
- Language Quality
- Mathematical Formulae, Symbols, Abbreviations, and Units
- Content Requiring Revision
- References
- Supplementary Material
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4079-RC2
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Nov 2025
reply
Model code and software
Model of integrated social-ecological resilient land systems (InSEEDS) (v0.2.3). J. Breier et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14265856
copan:LPJmL, an advanced World-Earth modeling framework extending copan:CORE, integrating LPJmL as the Earth system interface for comprehensive social-ecological simulations. (v1.0.0) J. Breier et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14246191
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 297 | 65 | 18 | 380 | 30 | 14 | 17 |
- HTML: 297
- PDF: 65
- XML: 18
- Total: 380
- Supplement: 30
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
General Assessment
This manuscript presents InSEEDS, a coupled model integrating LPJmL with agent-based modeling to simulate agricultural transitions. While the coupling represents a technical achievement, the work appears to be more of a proof-of-concept than a study reaching substantial conclusions about agricultural transitions.
Detailed Evaluation Following ESD Criteria
The contribution of this paper represents more a proof of concept than substantial conclusions.
The following paragraph, written by the authors, summarizes well their contribution: “In this paper, we have introduced the InSEEDS model, described its social, ecological components, and their interactions, and tested the model’s parameter sensitivity. We laid out first simulation results that point to distinct centrally important elements and processes in the co-evolutionary model dynamics. We zoom into certain dimensions of the co-evolutionary dynamics that can be observed at different spatial scales of simulation results, from global to cell level.”
The conclusions are undermined by methodological limitations. The Paraguay case study (Section 4.2.1) is particularly concerning—the model predicts widespread adoption of conventional farming that contradicts historical trends, which the authors acknowledge but inadequately address.
Results largely align with interpretations and conclusions. However, some key concerns:
ODD and ODD+D protocols for the agent-based model are attached. Code is made available. Model setup and parameterization are described in detail. To ensure reproducibility, the authors should additionally prepare the following:
Critical issues identified:
Minor issues:
Excessive abbreviations: It is strongly recommended to reduce the number of abbreviations, where possible (e.g., SOM, WEM, SA, HLSO, CA, AB-DGVMs, …).
Sensitivity analysis: Requires major text (Chapter 3.3)/table/figure revisions. It seems that the analysis is solid, but the description is very erroneous and unclear.
Minor Corrections
Recommendation
The coupling framework represents a technical achievement, but the model's current implementation is too simplified and poorly validated for the ambitious claims made. The authors must either:
The current manuscript falls between these positions, claiming transformative insights while acknowledging fundamental limitations that undermine those very claims.
Note to editor: I am not familiar with LPJmL initialization and spin-up processes and cannot assess the respective paragraph in Section 3.2.