Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3993
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3993
29 Aug 2025
 | 29 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Potential of optical and ecological proxies to quantify phytoplankton carbon in oligotrophic waters

David Antoine, Chandanlal Parida, and Camille Grimaldi

Abstract. Satellite ocean color observations provide two proxies to estimate the phytoplankton carbon concentration, Cphyto, then used as input to models quantifying growth rates and primary production, namely the phytoplankton chlorophyll-a concentration, Chl-a, and the particulate backscattering coefficient, bbp. Variability in phytoplankton community composition, pigment assemblages and contribution of non-algal material all interplay in the relation between these proxies and Cphyto, so that no ubiquitous relationship exists between them. It is accordingly still unclear which of Chl-a or bbp is best suited to quantify Cphyto, or whether they both are yet each in specific trophic conditions, especially for low-productivity oligotrophic waters. Here we use a data set from the eastern Indian Ocean that includes phytoplankton cell counts, phytoplankton pigments, particulate organic carbon (POC) and inherent optical properties (IOPs) to perform a comparative assessment of Cphyto derived from either Chl-a or bbp or cell counts combined with allometric relationships. We found significant correlations (r2 > ~0.5–0.6) between the three Cphyto estimates and IOPs, Chl-a or POC when samples from all depths down to 150 m are included. When only the top 25 m are included (amenable to ocean color remote sensing), no significant relationships were found, except between the cytometry-derived Cphyto and both Chl and POC. The bbp-derived Cphyto showed the smallest variability across the entire data set. These results warn about applying to satellite ocean color observations relationships derived from data collected throughout the euphotic layer.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
David Antoine, Chandanlal Parida, and Camille Grimaldi

Status: open (until 11 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
David Antoine, Chandanlal Parida, and Camille Grimaldi
David Antoine, Chandanlal Parida, and Camille Grimaldi

Viewed

Total article views: 864 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
839 20 5 864 9 12 6
  • HTML: 839
  • PDF: 20
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 864
  • Supplement: 9
  • BibTeX: 12
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 831 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 831 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 19 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
A dataset of phytoplankton cell counts, pigments, particulate organic carbon and optical properties enables comparison of three methods to estimate phytoplankton carbon (Cphyto) in oligotrophic waters, where uncertainties in phytoplankton productivity are still large. Two methods based on chlorophyll concentration and particulate backscattering, are scalable to global scale while cell counts reduce bias from non-algal material. This comparison clarifies uncertainties in optical Cphyto estimates.
Share