Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-396
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-396
10 Feb 2025
 | 10 Feb 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Ocean Science (OS).

Observational-based quantification of physical processes that impact the evolution of global mean sea level

Sjoerd Groeskamp

Abstract. The global mean sea level (GMSL) rise budget can be closed by integrating over global density distribution to account for ocean expansion, combined with satellite altimetry and ice sheet mass balances obtained from satellites and models. Such methods are of great importance, but the disadvantage is that they gloss over the individual fundamental physical processes that impact the evolution of GMSL. Such process are for example (but not limited to) the impact of ocean mixing and stirring, neutral physics, shortwave radiation and boundary heat and freshwater fluxes. It is valuable to quantify these processes as it provides understanding in the fundamental processes behind the observed GMSL rise and how these processes may change and in a transient ocean and climate. This study estimates the contribution of individual physical processes contributing to GMSL rise, using observational based products. It is not the intention and neither possible at this stage, to close the GMSL budget by means of this approach. Instead the results allow us to gain insights in the magnitude and uncertainty of processes and their relative importance in shaping GMSL rise, and allows for a comparison of the impact on GMSL by single processes or parameterizations. Results indicate the great uncertainty related to boundary heat, mass and freshwater fluxes, and the importance of ocean mixing for GMSL rise. Unexpected results are the significant impact of shortwave radiation depth penetration parameterizations and the way by which neutral physics is implemented. Many of the results are of importance for observational-based calculations as well as for modelers that have specific choices to make about which method and parameterizations they choose. These choices significantly impact the accuracy of predicted future sea level rise upon which policy will be based.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Ocean Science.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Sjoerd Groeskamp

Status: open (until 07 Apr 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sjoerd Groeskamp
Sjoerd Groeskamp

Viewed

Total article views: 84 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
51 28 5 84 6 5
  • HTML: 51
  • PDF: 28
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 84
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 98 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 98 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 22 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
It is possible to close the sea level rise budget, but we can’t estimate the underlying processes, such as ocean mixing or how sunlight penetrates into the deep ocean. This study estimates the size of these processes and how well we know them. It turns out we don’t know them very well, or how they will change in the future. This should worry us and we need to do more ocean observations to improve our understanding how these processes will change and impact future sea level rise.
Share