the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Internal solitary waves refraction and diffraction from interaction with eddies off the Amazon Shelf from SWOT
Abstract. Off the Amazon shelf, mesoscale eddies interact with internal solitary waves (ISWs), modifying their characteristics. For the first time, such interactions are directly observed through repeated measurements from a set of high-resolution satellite data, including the recently launched SWOT (Surface Water and Ocean Topography) mission. This study investigates ISWs detectable in SWOT Absolute Dynamic Topography (ADT) and characterizes the changes in their properties induced by interactions with mesoscale eddies.
The analysis focuses on three scenarios: ISW propagation in the absence of eddies, ISW refraction by a cyclonic eddy, and ISW diffraction by an anticyclonic eddy. ISW crests were identified and extracted using a band-pass filtering technique, allowing accurate tracking of key features such as propagation direction, spacing between individual crests, and wavecrest geometry. Before any interaction with eddies, mode-1 ISWs propagate steadily, with consistent direction and planar wavefronts. A key finding is the variety of ISW responses depending on eddy conditions. In the first case, in the absence of eddy, the interaction of ISWs with a seamount induced energy transfer from mode-1 to mode-3 ISWs, while the propagation direction remains unchanged. In the second case, a cyclonic eddy overlaying the seamount refracted ISW trajectories westward by approximately 50°, while also increasing wavecrest curvature and enhancing the generation of mode-3 waves. In the third case, at the western edge of an anticyclonic eddy near the seamount, the ISWs are split into two distinct paths: one branch refracted westward, exhibiting flatter wave crests and reduced spacing between them; the other branch followed the eastern edge of the eddy, displaying surface signatures of wave packets and enhanced wavecrest curvature.
These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in capturing the complex dynamics of ISWs. They offer novel insights into the nonlinear behavior of ISWs and their interactions with mesoscale and submesoscale oceanic features.
- Preprint
(7355 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 31 Oct 2025)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3933', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Sep 2025 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3933', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Oct 2025
reply
Please see the attached document
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,190 | 36 | 11 | 1,237 | 39 | 37 |
- HTML: 1,190
- PDF: 36
- XML: 11
- Total: 1,237
- BibTeX: 39
- EndNote: 37
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Comments on “Internal solitary waves refraction and diffraction from interaction with eddies off the Amazon Shelf from SWOT” by Goret et al.
Based on a combination of Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) and Multiscale Inversion of Ocean Surface Topography (MIOST) surface height observations and MODIS TERRA/AQUA optical images, the authors investigated the internal solitary waves (ISWs) off the Amazon Shelf as well as their interaction with mesoscale eddies near a seamount. They found that the ISW characteristics, including the modal content, propagation direction and wavecrest curvature, are significantly changed after interacting with the mesoscale eddies, which largely depend on the eddy conditions. Overall, the paper is clearly written.
My major concern is about the wavenumber spectra shown in Figure 8 and corresponding descriptions, especially for the internal wave modal content. According to my understanding, mode-3 internal tides (ITs) off the Amazon Shelf may have a horizontal wavelength of approximately 50km. However, it cannot be concluded that any signal with a horizontal wavelength of approximately 50 km corresponds to mode-3 ITs (Line 331). Actually, comparing spectra #2, #3 and #4 as well as the ADT_swot snapshots in Figures 8G and 8H, the peak appearing at approximately 50 km on spectrum #2 might be ISW packets rather than mode-3 ITs. Moreover, the authors mentioned in section 5.4.1 that the mode-3 ITs are reproduced in numerical investigations (Kouogang et al., 2025b, in preparation). I think that it is necessary to show some key results that support the generation of mode-3 ITs in this study or in a supporting material.
My second concern is also related to the no-eddy (NE) case. In both the anticyclonic eddy (AE) and cyclonic eddy (CE) cases, ISW packets are observed prior to encountering the mesoscale eddy/seamount. In the NE case, however, only isolated ISWs are observed before reaching the seamount. To draw robust conclusions regarding the influence of mesoscale eddies on ISWs, it is recommended to identify an example where ISW packets exist before the seamount interaction for the NE case.
Figures 7A-C. It is recommended that the authors present these figures using the same spatial domain, if possible.
There are two “section 5.5” in this paper, with one appearing ahead of “section 5.4”.