Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3924
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3924
08 Sep 2025
 | 08 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Accounting for spatiotemporally correlated errors in wind speed for remote surveys of methane emissions

Bradley M. Conrad and Matthew R. Johnson

Abstract. Spatiotemporally correlated errors in wind speeds estimated via numerical weather prediction (NWP) models – where estimated wind speeds and associated uncertainties at similar times or at nearby sites are likely to be correlated – are an important, but to date neglected, determinant of overall uncertainties in remote surveys of emissions in the oil and gas and other sectors. In this work, we develop a methodology to model such errors using publicly available, anemometer-measured wind speeds at weather stations within a region of interest. The method is parsed into two: (1) creation of a region-averaged wind speed error model to provide the probability of the true wind speed given an NWP model-estimated wind speed while ignoring autocorrelation, and (2) development of a Gaussian copula model for the region of interest (ROI) to capture spatiotemporal autocorrelation. The combined model for total wind uncertainty, including spatiotemporally autocorrelated errors, is demonstrated using the oil and gas-producing region of northeastern British Columbia, Canada as a case study. We also provide additional combined models for the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan, the U.S. state of North Dakota, and Colombia. Finally, we share a simple python code to interface with these models and to simplify application by others. The combined models show varying correlations in wind speed errors, which are attributable to the variability of terrain in the ROIs and the relative accuracy of different NWP models. Results further reveal how temporal correlations and hence uncertainties in aggregated emissions can be minimized through remote survey design, where waiting at least two days before revisiting a site and phase shifting re-surveys by approximately six hours can avoid both near-field and diurnal patterns in temporal autocorrelation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Bradley M. Conrad and Matthew R. Johnson

Status: open (until 14 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Bradley M. Conrad and Matthew R. Johnson

Data sets

Supplemental Code and Derived Models for "Accounting for spatiotemporally correlated errors in wind speed for remote surveys of methane emissions" Bradley M. Conrad https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/PMLX4X

Bradley M. Conrad and Matthew R. Johnson
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 08 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
This paper demonstrates a method for quantifying wind speed uncertainties in remote emissions surveys that specifically accounts for how wind errors are correlated across time and space. Using independent weather station data, models are presented for oil and gas regions in Canada, the U.S., and Colombia, along with a Python tool to enable broader use. This work enables robust accounting of uncertainties in emissions inventories and provides guidance to minimize uncertainties in remote surveys.
Share