the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantifying landcover-specific fluxes over a heterogeneous landscape through coupling UAV-measured mixing ratios with a large-eddy simulation model and Eddy-covariance measurements
Abstract. Many natural ecosystems are composed of heterogeneous patches differentiated by wetness levels and vegetation composition, resulting in fine-scale flux patterns across the different landcovers that can be challenging to quantify. Here, we present a case study at Stordalen Mire in subarctic Sweden, where we conducted Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) measurements of CO2 mole fractions and combine them with a large-eddy simulation (LES) model through a site-level inversion method to differentiate the flux rate signatures from different patch types. We use the LES model EULAG (EUlerian LAGrangian) to simulate high-resolution flow patterns and benchmark the spatial variability of modelled concentrations with data from UAV-based grid surveys of CO2 mixing ratio. Coupling the inversion results with eddy-covariance (EC) flux measurements for the time of the UAV flight allows quantifying net CO2 fluxes for the individual landcover types. Model evaluation showed an R2 exceeding 0.60, with model uncertainties mostly related to the transport model uncertainty and the UAV sampling footprint that does not evenly sample landcover types. The inversion fluxes were subsequently compared to patch-level chamber measurements of carbon dioxide from palsa, bog, and fen, and showed a good agreement in flux patterns across those patch types dominating the UAV-sampled footprint. Different landcover classification schemes were considered, and results showed a consistent improvement in the model performance when further representing the ecological and hydrological heterogeneities. Our novel technique shows promising results in estimating landcover-type flux heterogeneity within eddy-covariance tower footprints, thus providing a basis for upscaling of EC fluxes to a larger domain.
- Preprint
(1615 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3791', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Sep 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Theresia Yazbeck, 08 Oct 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3791', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Sep 2025
The study by Theresia Yazbeck et al. investigates an innovative method for quantifying CO2 fluxes from heterogeneous land cover types, by combining Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) measurements with large-eddy simulation (LES) modeling and eddy covariance tower data. It was conducted at Stordalen Mire in subarctic Sweden, a permafrost peatland with diverse patches of vegetation, including elevated palsa areas, wet bogs, fens, and open water. This method helps bridge the gap between small-scale chamber measurements and relatively large-scale tower data, providing a more accurate way to estimate carbon balance across heterogeneous land cover types. I found the paper interesting, useful, and worthy of publication in the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques after some minor revision, not so much in terms of redoing the analysis, but rather providing a perspective on important questions. In principle, it is a good contribution to address the carbon balance in the heterogeneous ecosystems. My specific comments are listed below.
Page 4, line 112-113: please remove the sentence ‘The tower location is shown on the map in Figure 1’. It is a repetition of tower position already mentioned in line 112.
Page 4, line 115-118: ‘Chamber measurements of CO2 fluxes ....the daytime, mostly between 8:00 and 14:00 local time’. Based on results obtained during these timeslots, what could be the potential contribution of nighttime fluxes from individual landcover types?
Page 9, Line 213: What is the background concentration?
Line 324: Check R2 value and correct it in the whole manuscript.
Line 354: in the sentence ‘Taking this range as a reference, our estimations appear to be slightly over-estimating lake emissions... bogs (Holmes et al., 2022)’. While authors largely discussed model uncertainty, the other sources, including chamber measurements and eddy covariance data (collected during neutral conditions where simulations were performed), were not discussed. This remains important to be discussed because the approach contributes to a better understanding of carbon dynamics in complex landscapes, which is crucial for accurate greenhouse gas accounting and climate modeling.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3791-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Theresia Yazbeck, 08 Oct 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,643 | 46 | 21 | 1,710 | 31 | 27 |
- HTML: 1,643
- PDF: 46
- XML: 21
- Total: 1,710
- BibTeX: 31
- EndNote: 27
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
General Comments
This manuscript presents interesting and important research for quantifying landcover-specific CO₂ fluxes in a heterogeneous ecosystem through an innovative approach. It introduces a practical framework to bridge the gap between small-scale chamber and ecosystem-level footprints by combining UAV, LES modeling, and eddy covariance (EC) measurements. Stordalen, the study site, is highly relevant and illustrates the strength of the method. Overall, the manuscript presents a well-explained methodology with thorough analysis and provides convincing comparisons between chamber and EC data. Taken as a whole, this paper makes a valuable and timely contribution to AMT and is suitable for publication following revisions.
Technical Corrections