Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3772
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3772
18 Aug 2025
 | 18 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

Forest conversion reduces soil water retention in tropical rainforest by altering soil properties

Qiaoyan Chen, Siyuan Cheng, Shuting Yu, Xiaowei Guo, Zhongyi Sun, Zhongmin Hu, and Licong Dai

Abstract. Extensive primary forests are being converted to secondary forests and plantation owing to human activities in recent decades, which has substantial effects on soil hydrological processes. However, the potential impact of forest conversion on soil water retention remains poorly understood. In this study, tropical primary forests (PF), secondary forests (SF) and rubber monocultures (RM) converted from tropical primary forests were selected on Hainan Island, to examine the variation in soil water retention across three forest types and their controlling factors. We found that the primary forests exhibited significantly greater water retention capacity than secondary forests and rubber monocultures. However, secondary forests showed higher water retention than rubber monocultures in shallow soils but lower in deep soils. Similarly, primary forests demonstrated significantly greater soil water storage capacity than secondary forests and rubber monocultures, but secondary forests and rubber monocultures had obvious seasonal variations, which showed that secondary forests had a higher water storage capacity than rubber monocultures in the rainy season, and display opposite pattern in the dry season. The saturated hydraulic conductivity in primary forests was higher than that in secondary forests and rubber monoculture. Furthermore, forest types influenced soil properties, with secondary forests and rubber monoculture showing higher bulk density but lower soil capillary porosity compared with primary forests. Among all factors, soil porosity emerged as the dominant controller of water retention, where total porosity and capillary porosity accounted for 31.49 % and 30.61 % of variation respectively, while soil bulk density contributed relatively less (12.46 %). These findings indicate that the conversion of tropical primary forests to secondary forests and rubber monocultures is detrimental to soil water retention and storage. Our results can provide scientific insights for forest development and management in the tropical rainforest.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Qiaoyan Chen, Siyuan Cheng, Shuting Yu, Xiaowei Guo, Zhongyi Sun, Zhongmin Hu, and Licong Dai

Status: open (until 13 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Qiaoyan Chen, Siyuan Cheng, Shuting Yu, Xiaowei Guo, Zhongyi Sun, Zhongmin Hu, and Licong Dai
Qiaoyan Chen, Siyuan Cheng, Shuting Yu, Xiaowei Guo, Zhongyi Sun, Zhongmin Hu, and Licong Dai

Viewed

Total article views: 309 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
288 15 6 309 12 12
  • HTML: 288
  • PDF: 15
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 309
  • BibTeX: 12
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 302 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 302 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
We compared soil properties and water storage capacity across these three forest types, finding that conversion from primary forests significantly reduced water retention capacity. While secondary forests exhibited better water retention than rubber plantations in shallow soil layers, they showed weaker capacity in deeper soils, with distinct seasonal variations in water storage. Soil porosity was identified as the key determining factor, with primary forests maintaining higher porosity.
Share