Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3695
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3695
25 Aug 2025
 | 25 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Technical note: Comparing ozone production efficiency (OPE) of chemical mechanisms using chemical process analysis (CPA)

Katie Tuite, Alan M. Dunker, and Greg Yarwood

Abstract. Chemical mechanisms are critical to chemical transport models for air quality research and policy analysis. Several mechanisms are available and intercomparison, especially using metrics which reduce sensitivity to modeling scenario, is important for interpreting results and assessing uncertainties. Here, we investigate Ozone Production Efficiency (OPE) as a comparison metric under conditions where nitrogen oxides (NOX) are limited. OPE is the net number of ozone molecules produced per NOX molecule lost and can be computed in simulations using chemical process analysis (CPA). We compute OPE (OPE-CPA) for four chemical mechanisms (CB6r5, CB7r1, SAPRC07, RACM2) and find a similar response to varying anthropogenic emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and NOX. RACM2 consistently produces the largest OPE-CPA and differences between mechanisms are greatest at high VOC/NOX ratios. The high RACM2 OPE-CPA is partially due to a slower OH + NO2 rate and potentially to its treatment of NOX recycling. OPE-CPA is generally consistent with aircraft OPE measurements downwind of Houston but direct comparison is difficult due to uncertainties in deposition and VOC speciation. More recent OPE measurements are required to determine whether trends over time are consistent. OPE-CPA responds nonlinearly to NOX and increases at low NOX even as ozone production decreases. Using OPE to predict ozone response to NOX emissions reductions is therefore an oversimplification that will tend to overstate ozone reductions. OPE-CPA is a viable metric to compare mechanisms, however, additional work would be helpful to define standardized conditions for comparisons.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Katie Tuite, Alan M. Dunker, and Greg Yarwood

Status: open (until 06 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Katie Tuite, Alan M. Dunker, and Greg Yarwood
Katie Tuite, Alan M. Dunker, and Greg Yarwood

Viewed

Total article views: 652 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
641 10 1 652 4 7 7
  • HTML: 641
  • PDF: 10
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 652
  • Supplement: 4
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 652 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 652 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 30 Aug 2025
Download
Short summary
Gas-phase chemical mechanisms are key components of air quality models used by regulatory agencies for air quality and public health planning. We use modeled ozone concentrations and Ozone Production Efficiency (OPE) to compare four chemical mechanisms and find that OPE is a viable comparison metric under atmospheric conditions where nitrogen oxides are limited. Using OPE to predict how ozone responds to emissions reductions, however, is an oversimplification that can overstate ozone reductions.
Share