the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
GeoDS (v.1.0) : a simple Geographical DownScaling model for long-term precipitation data over complex terrains
Abstract. Global climate models offer the most comprehensive description of the climate system and its internal processes to date but current computational capabilities typically restrict their spatial resolution to the order of tens of kilometers when multi-decennial or longer simulations are required. For climate applications, it is notoriously difficult to generate high spatial resolution data over long timescales (typically millennial). Over the years, various downscaling techniques have been developed to generate fine scale data from climate models outputs but they often exhibit important limitations when applied over long periods of time. Building on previous efforts, we present a simple topography-based model (GeoDS) to downscale precipitation fields in complex areas, adapted to paleoclimate studies involving multi-millenia simulations. With a limited amount of inputs from a climate model and high resolved geographical information, the model computes, for each time step and every grid point, a topographic exposure index used to distribute precipitation into a high-resolution spatial grid. This dimensionless quantity represents the exposure of surfaces to dominant windward incoming airflows, assumed to bring most of the humidity, and only depends on large scale winds and terrain configuration. The model is first tested under current climate conditions over part of the European Alpine region due to the availability of field data for comparison ; the complexity of both regional topography and climate conditions making it a good test of the proposed methodology. The relative effects of the model’s parameters are assessed as well as the capacity of GeoDS to reproduce the spatial precipitation distribution of a well-resolved gridded target dataset. Despite uncertainties regarding the correct wind fields to choose as input, and the dependency of the model to the temporal resolution of the large-scale data to downscale, we show that the procedure is able to capture most of the patterns occurring at fine spatial scale while being computationally inexpensive. We also demonstrate that the physical base underlying our work grants the model valuable robustness when used outside the calibration framework. This notably opens promising prospects for the application of GeoDS in paleoclimate contexts while providing a flexible, open source and well documented downscaling tool for the climate community.
- Preprint
(9689 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3617', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3617/egusphere-2025-3617-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-3617-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jean-Baptiste Brenner, 04 Dec 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3617', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 Nov 2025
The study presents a new downscaling method to estimate regional precipitation at high spatial resolution from large-scale, lower resolution precipitation and wind fields. This methodology can be applied to estimate future climate changes at regional and local scales in regions with complex topography, using simulated changes from low-resolution global climate models.
Recommendation: I found the idea interesting, the manuscript is generally well written, and the study seems to be technically well conducted. I have some general suggestions for the authors to address in a revised version. The qualification of the required revisions (major or minor) depends on the outcome of my first comment.
1) The main idea that local precipitation is mainly driven by the amount of large-scale precipitation and the direction of wind relative to the topography seems to be applicable only for large-scale precipitation, but certainly not so for convective precipitation. The area where the methodology is being tested, Switzerland, experiences both types of precipitation, mainly depending on the season. The analysis of the method's skill is not seasonally stratified, so my concern is whether this skill is primarily derived from winter-time large-scale frontal precipitation. I think a seasonal stratification of the skill needs to be included and possibly discussed if there are seasonal differences. If they are, would the methodology need to include other fields, such as near-surface air temperature or air column stability, to account for convection?
This is my primary concern. If there are indeed seasonal differences, the manuscript would need major revisions. If not, the required modifications are, in my view, minor.
2) Regarding the manuscript itself, the paragraphs are really long. This could be improved to help the reader discern the chain of thought and to better locate paragraphs in a second reading. For instance, the introduction contains just one long paragraph (!), but this problem is also present in other sections. As a broad rule of thumb, a paragraph should be devoted to developing only one idea/message.
3) Regarding the data description, did the data present gaps? Were they somehow filled? The precipitation data were aggregated to monthly sums. If gaps were present, were those months proportionally rescaled?
4) 'using a first order conservative remapping from the Climate Data Operator package'
The CDO package offers several remapping options. I guess that in this case, the proper way to coarsen the data is to calculate the average of the high-resolution data within the low-resolution cells and not by interpolation. Was the coarsening conducted so?
5) 'On a global scale, the algorithm...'
Global scale sounds strange here. The authors probably mean the regional average.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3617-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jean-Baptiste Brenner, 04 Dec 2025
Data sets
GeoDS downscaled datasets Jean-Baptiste Brenner https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16420096
Model code and software
Code of GeoDS Jean-Baptiste Brenner https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17045252
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,401 | 95 | 25 | 1,521 | 25 | 21 |
- HTML: 1,401
- PDF: 95
- XML: 25
- Total: 1,521
- BibTeX: 25
- EndNote: 21
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1