Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3559
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3559
15 Sep 2025
 | 15 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Brief Communication: Rejuvenating and strengthening the science-policy interface required to implement the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

Joel C. Gill

Abstract. Here we discuss the health of the science-policy interface required to support implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. Reflecting on the 2025 Global Platform for Disaster Reduction, we identify weaknesses in current mechanisms for scientific engagement. While the Sendai Framework highlights science as foundational to effective risk reduction, engagement remains limited by ad hoc structures and unclear processes. This article proposes three steps to revitalise the science-policy interface, emphasising inclusivity, synthesising scholarly contributions to support knowledge sharing, and dedicated thematic forums. Strengthening this science-policy interface is essential to realising the Sendai Framework's objectives through and beyond 2030.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Joel C. Gill

Status: open (until 27 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Joel C. Gill
Joel C. Gill
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 15 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
This article looks at how science connects with policy to reduce disaster risks. Although the Sendai Framework says science is key, current efforts to bring together scientists and share their perspectives with other stakeholders are not as effective as they could be. We suggest three ways to improve this: include more voices, better share research, and create spaces to discuss key topics.
Share