the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Projections of changes in extreme storm surges for European coasts using statistical downscaling
Abstract. Understanding future changes in extreme storm surges (ESSs) is critical for coastal risk assessment and adaptation. However, existing projections in Europe are often based on computationally expensive dynamical models, limiting ensemble sizes and thus confidence in projected changes. In this study, we develop a cost-effective statistical downscaling model (SDM) trained to replicate dynamically downscaled storm surges, enabling the generation of a pan-European ensemble of ESS projections based on 17 global climate models (GCMs) – substantially expanding previous efforts.
The SDM is trained on a storm surge hindcast and demonstrates stable skill across historical and future climates, effectively capturing projected ESSs changes given by dynamical simulations. Ensemble projections reveal robust multi-model mean (MMM) changes in the 10-year return level (RL10) of ESSs by 2100. Negative MMM changes are identified in the Mediterranean Sea (−7 %), Moroccan Atlantic coast (−10 %), and Danish Straits (−6 %), while positive changes of around +6 % are projected for the Celtic and Irish Seas, western Denmark, and the Gulf of Finland. Despite these robust signals, inter-model spread is substantial, with likely ranges (17th–83rd percentiles) extending from −25 % to +17 % across Europe, and changes of up to ±35 % in individual models. The southern North Sea and northern Baltic Sea emerge as low-confidence regions, marked by particularly strong inter-model spread. Higher return levels (e.g., 100-year) show larger changes but increased uncertainty.
Our results underscore the importance of extended ensembles in projecting ESSs in Europe and demonstrate the value of statistical models for applications that demand extensive simulations – such as climate projections based on large ensembles, multi-scenario climate analyses, and detection and attribution studies – which can complement computationally expensive traditional dynamical downscaling methods.
- Preprint
(2918 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2987 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3558', Tim Hermans, 17 Oct 2025
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Maialen Irazoqui Apecechea, 03 Mar 2026
We sincerely thank you for your comments.
Regarding the weighted regression proposed, we agree that this would be a very interesting model to test, as our regression currently optimizes for the average conditions and not extremes. This is highlighted in the revised manuscript (to be uploaded) in the Discussion as a possible way to improve the statistical model. In our study, the objective was not to develop a new methodology, but adopt a method previously shown to be successfull for the reconstruction of storm-surges, tailor it to Europe, and evaluate its capability to project extreme storm surge changes, which is enabled through benchmarking against dynamical simulations. We have now better highlighted this objective in the revised manuscript, and we have better highlighted the limitations of the model throughout the paper. In the revision, we have also focused statistical projections on the 10-year event, given larger biases now shown for the 100 year event.
Finally, regarding the comment on the validation of statistical projections of ESS changes against the numerical model projections, we agree that results deserved a more detailed description and a quantitative assessment. The reviewers also highlight that these results and associated conclusions needed to be better supported. Therefore, we have now added quantitative skill metrics to the comparison between the statistical vs. dynamically downscaled projections of changes in the 10-year storm surge level (pattern correlation coefficient,mean absolute bias, % of points where the sign of projected changes in reproduced) and we have considerably expanded this section to describe these metrics and properly justify the different claims in performance.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3558-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Maialen Irazoqui Apecechea, 03 Mar 2026
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3558', Marta Marcos, 23 Oct 2025
Please, see the attached file with the revision
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maialen Irazoqui Apecechea, 03 Mar 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3558', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Jan 2026
I congratulate the authors for the substantial effort invested in this study. The manuscript addresses an important and timely topic and provides a valuable contribution by exploring future projections of daily maximum storm surges along European coasts using statistical downscaling applied to a large CMIP6 ensemble.
The numerical and statistical workload behind this study is impressive, and the authors make a huge effort to assess the validity of their statistical downscaling approach under climate change conditions. The pan-European scope and ensemble-based perspective are clear strengths.
That said, I believe the manuscript would benefit significantly from improvements in structure, clarity, and methodological rigor, particularly regarding hypothesis formulation, inference, and the separation between methods and results. In its current form, methods and results are often interwoven, making the paper difficult to follow. In addition, while many validation steps are presented, the confidence in the final projections remains limited, partly due to the lack of formal hypothesis testing and inference in several key analyses.
My comments attached are intended to be constructive. Some are necessarily subjective or based on my interpretation (comprehensive summary attached in the same document); please feel free to disregard them where they are not useful or where I may have misunderstood aspects of the work.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Maialen Irazoqui Apecechea, 03 Mar 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 420 | 123 | 33 | 576 | 55 | 30 | 21 |
- HTML: 420
- PDF: 123
- XML: 33
- Total: 576
- Supplement: 55
- BibTeX: 30
- EndNote: 21
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The authors present a very interesting analysis on statistical modeling of dynamic changes in storm surges. I have two specific questions that may be helpful while revising the paper: