Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3548
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3548
26 Aug 2025
 | 26 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Acute changes in macronutrient stoichiometry alter nitrate uptake in benthic biofilms

Anika Große, Alexander J. Reisinger, Nuria Perujo, Patrick Fink, Dietrich Borchardt, and Daniel Graeber

Abstract. Benthic biofilms, located at the sediment-water interface, are hot-spots for macronutrient cycling in headwater streams. Here, the supply of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P), affects nutrient cycling processes such as nitrate uptake. Flushing events can add short-term pulses of DOC, N and P to streams, changing the macronutrient ratios in the stream water, altering stoichiometric imbalances between water and microbial macronutrient ratios. However, there is little information on whether these short-term changes in macronutrient imbalances can alter biofilm nitrate uptake. To better understand how acute changes to DOC, N, and P stoichiometric imbalances affect nitrate uptake, we sampled stream biofilms from four different sites in Florida and incubated them in the lab in mesocosms after changing their macronutrient ratios by adding DOC and/or nitrate. Here we show that biofilms from anthropogenically less impacted streams with less N excess increased their nitrate uptake after 48 h of incubation in different macronutrient stoichiometric ratios, but biofilm structure remained mainly unaffected. Furthermore, nitrate uptake was positively related to biofilm metabolism, differentiating in sites with more autotrophic- or more heterotrophic-driven nitrate uptake. Our study reveals that acute changes in macronutrient stoichiometric imbalance between stream water and biofilm microorganisms changes nitrate uptake. This needs to be considered when assessing short-term nitrate uptake capacity of stream reaches.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Anika Große, Alexander J. Reisinger, Nuria Perujo, Patrick Fink, Dietrich Borchardt, and Daniel Graeber

Status: open (until 07 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Anika Große, Alexander J. Reisinger, Nuria Perujo, Patrick Fink, Dietrich Borchardt, and Daniel Graeber
Anika Große, Alexander J. Reisinger, Nuria Perujo, Patrick Fink, Dietrich Borchardt, and Daniel Graeber

Viewed

Total article views: 1,124 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,106 15 3 1,124 13 12
  • HTML: 1,106
  • PDF: 15
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 1,124
  • BibTeX: 13
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,096 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,096 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
In a lab study on Florida streams, we altered carbon and nitrogen levels to measure nitrate uptake by biofilms. After 48 hours, nitrate uptake increased, though the biofilm structure stayed the same. Bacteria-dominated biofilms responded to both carbon and nitrogen, while algae-dominated ones reacted more to nitrogen. Biofilms with high wastewater input did not show any changes in nitrate uptake. These findings help explain how streams can reduce pollution after nutrient pulses.
Share