the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Bacterial contribution to nitrogen processing in the atmosphere
Abstract. This study investigates potential microbial interactions with nitrogen compounds in the atmosphere, with a focus on inorganic forms (mainly NH4+, NO3-, and N2). The reanalysis of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes from cloud-free and cloudy collected at the mountain site of puy de Dôme (1465 m asl, France) indicate equivalent representation of genes involved in organic and inorganic nitrogen utilization processes. Glutamate metabolism and denitrification (in particular nitrite reduction) contributed most (70 %) of the microbial sequences of genes and transcripts linked to nitrogen utilization pathways. Other prevalent processes included assimilatory and dissimilatory nitrate reduction, and nitrogen fixation, with the latter being overexpressed in particular during clear atmospheric conditions. The screening of bacteria isolates revealed that 15 % of them carry the biomarker gene for biological N2 fixation (nifH). In addition, laboratory incubations of rainwater points towards the processing of NH4+. The decay rate of NH4+ concentration correlated positively with the relative abundance of Sphingomonadales, and negatively with that of Burkholderiales. The latter may rather obtain nitrogen from N2 and organic forms. Overall, these results demonstrate multiple potential microbiological roles in the processing of inorganic nitrogen in the atmosphere, in relation with atmospheric conditions and microbial diversity. This opens up new perspectives in our understanding of biogeochemical cycles and chemical processing in the atmosphere, as well as microbial functioning in this major part of the Earth system.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Biogeosciences.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(1916 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1483 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 30 Sep 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3534', Kai Finster, 01 Aug 2025
reply
Publisher’s note: this comment is a copy of RC1 and its content was therefore removed on 8 August 2025.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3534-CC1 -
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3534', Kai Finster, 05 Aug 2025
reply
The manuscript explores nitrogen cycling by natural airborne microbial communities using a combination of genetic and biogeochemical tools. Based on their data, the authors conclude that a significant fraction of the airborne microbial community has the potential to process organic and inorganic nitrogen compounds while airborne. Through rainwater incubations, they estimate the contribution of the community in processing these compounds, particularly for bio-assimilatory purposes. They conclude that while the contribution of the airborne microbial community to nitrogen cycling is insignificant on a global scale, it may be relevant for the survival of microbial cells while airborne.
Overall, I find the manuscript innovative and relevant to the field and recommend it for publication. However, I kindly ask the authors to address the following issues prior to publication:
- Equation 4: I had difficulty understanding this equation and was unable to reconcile the units. I would appreciate it if the authors could explain the equation in more detail and provide an example in the text showing how they performed the calculations.
- It is fascinating that the authors were able to determine transcripts in the clear sky samples. What was the relative humidity and how does that fit with what has been reported in the literature for microbical acitivity in relation to RH? I wonder if these transcripts could have been produced prior to aerosolization and preserved in the airborne state due to cell inactivity, which would include the turnover of the transcripts. Could the authors exclude this possibility and discuss the consequences for their interpretation?
- Denitrification is a process that occurs under oxygen-limited or anoxic conditions, where it replaces aerobic respiration. Do the authors have any indications that oxygen is limited for the cells while they are airborne? If so, why would the cells denitrify instead of using oxygen?
- Nitrogen fixation is an energetically costly process that microbes typically use only when other nitrogen sources are unavailable. This does not seem to be the case in the samples analyzed by the authors. Why would the cells rely on N2 fixation when other nitrogen sources are plentiful?
- The authors suggest anoxygenic phototrophs as possible candidates for N2 fixation. What would these microbes use as electron donors for N2 fixation while airborne? Many of them depend on reduced sulfur compounds or hydrogen. Are these valid sources in this context?
- The rainwater incubations lasted for several days. However, in the atmosphere, the retention time of microbes in rain droplets is much shorter. I would appreciate it if the authors could discuss the relevance of their estimates based on these long-term incubations.
- Lastly, I would appreciate a detailed discussion of Figure 5 (PCA plot) that summarizes the results.
I hope these comments and questions help strengthen the manuscript further. I look forward to your revisions.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3534-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
646 | 41 | 18 | 705 | 11 | 18 | 22 |
- HTML: 646
- PDF: 41
- XML: 18
- Total: 705
- Supplement: 11
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 22
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1