Where curling stones collide with rock physics: Cyclical damage accumulation and fatigue in granitoids
Abstract. Fatigue and damage accumulation in granitoids are classical, but poorly characterised, rock mechanics problems. We explore these phenomena by examining curling stone impacts. Curling stones are slid on ice and made to collide along a circumferential striking band. This well constrained scenario involves uniaxial compression of convex surfaces (i.e., Hertzian contacts). Each stone experiences about 2900 impacts per season, over a lifespan of 10–15 years before refurbishment, providing a unique opportunity to study fatigue and damage accumulation under cyclic loading.
Here, we first determine the stress magnitudes of head-on curling stone impacts using on-ice experiments involving a high-speed camera and pressure-sensitive films. We then characterise the damage observed in aged stones using photogrammetry, microtomography, and microscopy. For high-velocity impacts (2.93 ± 0.15 ms−1), a curling stone is locally and momentarily stressed to at least 300–680 MPa, exceeding its unconfined compressive strength. Curling stone impacts are dynamic in nature, as evidenced by strain rates (24 ± 4 s−1) that resemble seismic magnitudes, ejection of rock powder during collisions, and prevalence of Hertzian cone fractures in aged stones. In the striking band, damage is confined to macroscopic Hertzian cone fractures and their immediate collet zones, and does not appear to extend beyond about 3–5 cm into the stones (radially). The circumferential density of cone fractures is limited to about 2–2.5 fractures per cm.
We propose that (1) early, high-velocity impacts initiate cone fractures up to a specific spatial density, and (2) with subsequent collisions in the same regions of the striking band, cone fractures progressively propagate and coarsen. This concentrates and channels the accumulated damage, shielding the rest of the stones from reaching critical stress levels for damage. Our findings are significant for applications where rocks are exposed to repetitive, high-stress impacts and suggest that narrow damage zones can dampen high-impact stresses.
Competing interests: Some authors are members of the editorial board of Solid Earth
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.