the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Seven centuries of rainfall reconstructed from Scots Pine ring width in sub-Arctic Sweden
Abstract. As the sub-Arctic and Arctic regions undergoes rapid changes, understanding its hydroclimate history is more critical than ever. However, limited availability of moisture-sensitive proxy data severely constrains our insights, underscoring the urgent need for more hydroclimate reconstructions in the region. Here we present a May–June precipitation reconstruction based on ring width from living and dead trees of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growing under drought-stressed conditions at 63° N, near Skuleskogen National Park, on the northern part of the east coast of Sweden. The oldest deadwood sample dates back to the mid-11th century, and the Expressed Population Signal (EPS) exceeds 0.85 from 1320 CE until the present (2021 CE), making this the longest tree-ring-based hydroclimate reconstruction from high-latitude Fennoscandia. Unlike typical high-latitude forests in Fennoscandia, the trees at this site thrive under low-pressure conditions and show strong correlations up to approximately |r| = 0.6 over the period 1920–2021 with drought-related variables such as precipitation, cloud cover, solar radiation, potential evapotranspiration and diurnal temperature range. The climate signal is concentrated to a short window between mid-May and early July but reflects climatic conditions over a broad region. Significant spatial correlations extend over most of Sweden as well as large parts of Norway and Finland, indicating sensitivity to large-scale climate systems. The tree-ring chronology also shows clear cyclic patterns, with a particularly strong ~64-year cycle. The modern era stands out for its variability, with 2018 CE emerging as one of the of the driest year in the entire record. There is potential to extend the chronology further back in time, possibly to 1000 CE or earlier, and to extract additional climate information using other tree-ring parameters such as blue intensity.
- Preprint
(2955 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 17 Nov 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3497', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Oct 2025
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3497/egusphere-2025-3497-RC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-3497-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3497', Anonymous Referee #2, 21 Oct 2025
reply
This is a well-written and solid paper that makes a valuable contribution to the hydroclimatic reconstruction literature in northern Fennoscandia. The authors present an impressive millennium-long May–June precipitation reconstruction from sub-Arctic Sweden, a region where moisture-sensitive chronologies are scarce. The study is carefully executed, and the dataset will be of interest to both dendroclimatologists and those working on broader hydroclimatic variability in northern Europe. Congratulations on the hard work.
That said, a few aspects could be improved before acceptance:
References . The manuscript would benefit from including a few key recent works, especially those related to long-term hydroclimate variability and cyclic patterns. I recommend citing in the introduction Esper et al. (2024), and when talking about microsites, Hartl et al. (2021). Additionally, the recent work done by Torbenson et al. (2025), could provide relevant methodological and interpretive context for multidecadal variability and the role of large-scale ocean–atmosphere dynamics, particularly regarding the Maunder Minimum..
Figure 9 – This is arguably the main figure of the paper, yet its current design is suboptimal. The reconstruction, uncertainty bands, and historical annotations are visually cluttered. I suggest a clearer graphical layout ents. Lower the shades and highlight the reconstruction..
Discussion of cyclicity and solar forcing – The discussion of the ~64-year and ~34-year cycles is intriguing but could be developed further. In particular, the authors briefly mention the Dalton and Spörer minima but omit the Maunder Minimum, which is essential in the context of multi-decadal hydroclimate variability and possible solar forcing. I recommend adding a more explicit discussion of the Maunder Minimum, potential links to solar cycles (e.g., Gleissberg or Suess/de Vries), and whether these correspond to the periodicities found in the reconstruction and in AMO/PDO.
Appendix Figure D1. Very difficult to interpret. I suggest to include a larger plot with pannels for each reconstruction. Perhaps use only the 11 y running mean with shades in red for dry, and blue for wet periods. I would be better for interpreting all the figures. Otherwise it is useless..
In summary, this is a strong and original manuscript. I recommend acceptance after minor revisions, addressing the missing references, improving Figure 9, and expanding the discussion on long-term cyclicity and the Maunder Minimum.
Minor edits
Line 39 add Esper et al., 2024.. Difficult to explain why it is ommitted.. Esper, J., Torbenson, M. & Büntgen, U. 2023 summer warmth unparalleled over the past 2,000 years. Nature 631, 94–97 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07512-y
Line 46. Include https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2020.125787
Line 164, (march??) what´s that?
Line 312, what about comparing it with the OWDA or the most recently updated GEDA? that would be more sound than Pauling.. and apples to apples..
Line 465.. and the Maunder?? it is the solar minima of the last 500 years.. why is it not mentioned? you can discuss such growth-climate disruption using the recently published Torberson et al., 2025. Torbenson, M. C. A., Stahle, D. W., Cook, E. R., Cook, B. I., Büntgen, U., Chen, F., et al. (2025). Disruption of drought teleconnections between ENSO-influenced regions around 1700 CE. Geophysical Research Letters, 52, e2025GL115600. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL115600
Lines 485-490. More discussion on the relationship of AMO/ PDO and the positive and negative cycles.. is there a connection??? this is very important and could add value to the reconstruction.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3497-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 680 | 51 | 12 | 743 | 8 | 10 |
- HTML: 680
- PDF: 51
- XML: 12
- Total: 743
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1