the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Contributions of Transparent Exopolymer Particles by Specific Phytoplankton Groups in the Cosmonaut Sea, East Antarctic
Abstract. Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) play a crucial role in marine carbon cycling. While phytoplankton are known to be the primary contributors to TEP, the impact of changes in phytoplankton community structure on TEP production in natural aquatic environments remains incompletely understood. This study employed multiple linear regression (MLR) modeling to quantify the contributions of two dominant phytoplankton groups, diatoms and haptophytes (primarily Phaeocystis antarctica), to TEP production in the surface waters of the Cosmonaut Sea, antarctica during the austral summer. Results demonstrate that in situ TEP production by each group can be estimated by scaling laboratory-derived theoretical values with an environmentally adjusted correction factor. These factors, primarily governed by phytoplankton community structure, reveal taxon-specific discrepancies between field and laboratory TEP production capacities. Notably, temperature, ammonium, and polysaccharide composition act as secondary modifiers of through indirect physiological effects. This study revealed that when the chlorophyll a concentration (Chl a) of P. antarctica exceeds 0.5 μg/L in the Cosmonaut Sea, its TEP production capacity surpasses that of diatoms at equivalent biomass levels – challenging the paradigm of diatom-dominated TEP contributions. In the research area, P. antarctica contributed 14.6–82.5 % (mean: 48.6 ± 15.4 %) to total TEP production, while diatoms contributed 31.0–112.0 % (mean: 55.1 ± 21.2 %; values >100 % reflect co-occurring group contributions). This highlights the pivotal role of P. antarctica in Southern Ocean carbon cycling and provides mechanistic insights for refining polar carbon budget models.
- Preprint
                                        
(2600 KB)  - Metadata XML
 - BibTeX
 - EndNote
 
Status: open (until 23 Nov 2025)
- 
                     RC1:  'Comment on egusphere-2025-3445', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Oct 2025
            
                        
                                   reply
                            
                        
            
                            
                    
            
            
            
                        
- 
                                        
                                     AC1:  'Reply on RC1', Ji Hu, 30 Oct 2025
                            
                                        
                                                   reply
                                            
                                        
                            
                                            
                                    
                            
                            
                            
                                        
Dear Anonymous Reviewer,
Thank you very much for your time and effort in reviewing our manuscript. We sincerely appreciate your positive and constructive feedback.
We are particularly encouraged by your recognition that “the topic is highly relevant” and that “this study is very valuable to Antarctic research.” It is gratifying to know that you found our work to be a meaningful contribution to understanding the potential impacts of climate change on phytoplankton composition and the carbon cycle in the Southern Ocean.
We also note your comment regarding the mathematical approach, specifically that it “relies on many assumptions and has limitations, however the limitations are well addressed in the manuscript.” We thank you for this acknowledgment. We strived to be transparent about the methodological framework, and we are pleased that our discussion of these limitations was found to be adequate.
In light of your supportive comments, we will ensure that the significance of our findings and their implications for Antarctic research are further emphasized in the final version of the manuscript, particularly in the Discussion and Conclusion sections.
Once again, we are grateful for your insightful review and your endorsement of our work.
Sincerely,
Dr. Hu, Ji
On behalf of all co-authors.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3445-AC1  
 - 
                                        
                                     AC1:  'Reply on RC1', Ji Hu, 30 Oct 2025
                            
                                        
                                                   reply
                                            
                                        
                            
                                            
                                    
                            
                            
                            
                                        
 
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,849 | 24 | 16 | 1,889 | 14 | 23 | 
- HTML: 1,849
 - PDF: 24
 - XML: 16
 - Total: 1,889
 - BibTeX: 14
 - EndNote: 23
 
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % | 
|---|
| Total: | 0 | 
| HTML: | 0 | 
| PDF: | 0 | 
| XML: | 0 | 
- 1
 
                        
                        
                        
                        
The study combines field data, empirical relationships and statistical modelling, in order to quantify the production of TEP by different phytoplankton groups in the Cosmonaut Sea, East Antarctica. The mathematical approach used relies on many assumptions and has limitations, however the limitations are well addressed in the manuscript.
The topic is highly relevant in the waters surrounding Antarctica, in which the phytoplankton composition could be altered by climate change with cascading implications on TEP production and carbon cycle, making this study is very valuable to Antarctic research.