Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3349
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3349
21 Jul 2025
 | 21 Jul 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

The EAWS matrix, a look-up table to determine the regional avalanche danger level (Part B): Operational testing and use

Frank Techel, Karsten Müller, Christopher Marquardt, and Christoph Mitterer

Abstract. To support public safety and risk management in snow-covered mountain regions, avalanche forecasts must deliver reliable and credible information on avalanche conditions. To promote greater consistency in avalanche danger level assessment across European avalanche warning services, a revised version of the EAWS Matrix – a structured look-up table that combines snowpack stability, the frequency of snowpack stability, and avalanche size to determine the regional danger level. Developed through expert elicitation, the Matrix includes cells with a single suggested danger level, while about half also display a second option, reflecting cases where a substantial minority of experts proposed a different level. We analyzed its operational use over the first three winters following implementation by 26 European avalanche warning services. Most Matrix cells were predominantly associated with a single danger level in operational use, suggesting potential for structural simplification. However, two cells – poor–some–size 2 and very poor–some–size 3 – acted as transition zones with substantial overlap between adjacent danger levels and divergent use across services. Assessments with finer granularity – such as sub-classes within the predefined Matrix categories – revealed meaningful tendencies within coarse classes and may help preserve critical nuances in expert judgment. Moreover, incorporating observed tendencies within these classes may enable more targeted guidance on when to assign the higher or lower of the two danger levels shown in the Matrix. Several Matrix cells remained rarely used, supporting the use of white shading to indicate uncertainty or implausibility in danger level assignment. While Matrix application was relatively consistent for dry-snow problems, marked inconsistencies emerged for wet- and gliding-snow problems, particularly in the classification of snowpack stability for the latter ones. These findings underscore the need for community-wide discussion and alignment of stability assessment practices and offer insights for refining both operational avalanche danger assessment and the Matrix itself. However, because neither the danger level nor its input factors can be independently measured, a true validation of Matrix performance remains out of reach. This study forms part of the iterative development process described in detail in the companion paper by Müller et al. (2025).

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Frank Techel, Karsten Müller, Christopher Marquardt, and Christoph Mitterer

Status: open (until 10 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Frank Techel, Karsten Müller, Christopher Marquardt, and Christoph Mitterer
Frank Techel, Karsten Müller, Christopher Marquardt, and Christoph Mitterer

Viewed

Total article views: 1,417 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,317 89 11 1,417 28 26
  • HTML: 1,317
  • PDF: 89
  • XML: 11
  • Total: 1,417
  • BibTeX: 28
  • EndNote: 26
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,487 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,487 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
We studied how avalanche forecasters across Europe used a new tool called the EAWS Matrix to assess avalanche danger levels. Despite different approaches, many services used the Matrix in similar ways. Our findings can help to further improve the Matrix and support more consistent avalanche forecasts, leading to more reliable and credible avalanche information for people in snow-covered mountain regions.
Share