Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3326
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3326
11 Aug 2025
 | 11 Aug 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Impact of lower atmospheric scattering on ground-based optical thermospheric wind observations with spatially uneven airglow

Xiaolong Wei, Guoying Jiang, Yajun Zhu, Jiyao Xu, Weijun Liu, Tiancai Wang, Guangyi Zhu, and Wei Yuan

Abstract. Scattered airglow emissions in the lower atmosphere can bias ground-based interferometer observations of thermospheric winds, particularly when airglow brightness becomes spatially uneven due to auroras. During two geomagnetic storms with visible auroras on May 10th and Oct. 10th, 2024, the Doppler Asymmetric Spatial Heterodyne (DASH) and Fabry-Perot (FP) interferometers concurrently detected atypical winds at Siziwang (SIZW, 41.83° N, 111.93° E), suspected to be caused by scattering. These atypical winds, characterized by horizontal differences exceeding 400 m∙s⁻¹ between opposite cardinal directions (N–S or E–W) and downwelling exceeding 100 m∙s⁻¹, showed a strong temporal association with airglow brightness. By modelling the transmission of scattered airglow emissions, we calculated post-scattering wind speeds as the initial wind speeds weighted by both scattered and direct intensities. With fixed initial speeds, the simulation reproduced the temporal characteristics of the atypical winds, demonstrating that scattering causes these intense horizontal differences and downwelling. The simulation also shows that the scattering-induced biases have directional inhomogeneity with characteristics linked to the location and background line-of-sight speed of the brighter airglow region. The commonly used horizontal average wind may experience numerical deviations due to directional inhomogeneity. The accuracy of the simulation is limited by the accuracy of airglow observations and atmospheric optical depth.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Xiaolong Wei, Guoying Jiang, Yajun Zhu, Jiyao Xu, Weijun Liu, Tiancai Wang, Guangyi Zhu, and Wei Yuan

Status: open (until 15 Sep 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3326', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Aug 2025 reply
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3326', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Aug 2025 reply
Xiaolong Wei, Guoying Jiang, Yajun Zhu, Jiyao Xu, Weijun Liu, Tiancai Wang, Guangyi Zhu, and Wei Yuan
Xiaolong Wei, Guoying Jiang, Yajun Zhu, Jiyao Xu, Weijun Liu, Tiancai Wang, Guangyi Zhu, and Wei Yuan

Viewed

Total article views: 490 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
465 17 8 490 11 11
  • HTML: 465
  • PDF: 17
  • XML: 8
  • Total: 490
  • BibTeX: 11
  • EndNote: 11
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 487 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 487 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 30 Aug 2025
Download
Short summary
Scattered airglow can bias thermospheric wind observations by ground-based interferometers, especially when brightness is spatially uneven due to auroras. We simulated lower atmospheric scattering during two mid-latitude auroral events and confirmed that scattering leads to line-of-sight speed biases, thereby increasing the horizontal differences between opposite cardinal directions. This scattering impact needs to be carefully considered in thermospheric dynamics analysis.
Share