the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Linking European droughts to year-round weather regimes
Abstract. European droughts have far-reaching socio-economic and ecological impacts, yet their prediction remains challenging due to the complex interplay between regional climate variability and large-scale atmospheric circulation. This study investigates how persistent North Atlantic weather regimes influence the occurrence and spatial distribution of seasonal meteorological droughts across Europe throughout the year. Using reanalysis datasets and a tailored regionalization based on drought synchronicity, we identify six coherent European sub-regions and relate drought events, defined by the standardized precipitation index (SPI3), to year-round weather regimes derived from 500 hPa geopotential height anomalies. Our analysis shows that while each weather regime exhibits distinctive and seasonally consistent precipitation patterns, only a fraction of droughts—primarily in western Europe and during winter—can be directly attributed to anomalies in regime frequency. The findings underline the partial but regionally significant role of North Atlantic circulation patterns in shaping European drought risk, highlighting opportunities and limitations for improving drought forecasts on sub-seasonal to seasonal timescales. This study emphasizes the added value of using year-round weather regimes as a unifying framework for understanding drought drivers, overcoming the constraints of purely seasonal classifications. Improved understanding of these links could help refine climate models and support more robust early-warning systems for drought management across diverse European climates.
- Preprint
(38687 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3308', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Aug 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3308/egusphere-2025-3308-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-3308-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1, RC2 and editor', Onaïa Savary, 15 Oct 2025
Dear referees,
We appreciate your constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have elaborated a point-by-point response to your comments in the attached document. We hope that our response addresses your concerns.
Best regards,
On behalf of the authors,
Onaïa Savary, Constantin Ardilouze and Julien Cattiaux
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1, RC2 and editor', Onaïa Savary, 15 Oct 2025
Dear referees,
We appreciate your constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have elaborated a point-by-point response to your comments in the attached document. We hope that our response addresses your concerns.
Best regards,
On behalf of the authors,
Onaïa Savary, Constantin Ardilouze and Julien Cattiaux
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1, RC2 and editor', Onaïa Savary, 15 Oct 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3308', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Sep 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3308/egusphere-2025-3308-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1, RC2 and editor', Onaïa Savary, 15 Oct 2025
Dear referees,
We appreciate your constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have elaborated a point-by-point response to your comments in the attached document. We hope that our response addresses your concerns.
Best regards,
On behalf of the authors,
Onaïa Savary, Constantin Ardilouze and Julien Cattiaux
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1, RC2 and editor', Onaïa Savary, 15 Oct 2025
-
EC1: 'Editor comment on egusphere-2025-3308', Stephan Pfahl, 11 Sep 2025
Dear Onaïa Savary and co-authors,
Thank you for submitting your study on droughts and weather regimes to WCD. Your manuscript has been evaluated by two reviewers, who both acknowledge the general merits of your work, but also provide major comments and suggestions concerning both your methodological setup and interpretation of your findings. Please carefully account for these comments when preparing a revised version that I would then re-consider for potential publication. In particular, please think about potential adaptations of your methodology, or at least sensitivity tests, accounting for the many methodological comments by both reviewers. In addition, also with regard to the main scope of the journal, it would be very useful to further think about the interpretation of the different terms in your diagnostic (equation 11) with regard to meteorological processes.
I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
Best regards,
Stephan Pfahl
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3308-EC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1, RC2 and editor', Onaïa Savary, 15 Oct 2025
Dear referees,
We appreciate your constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have elaborated a point-by-point response to your comments in the attached document. We hope that our response addresses your concerns.
Best regards,
On behalf of the authors,
Onaïa Savary, Constantin Ardilouze and Julien Cattiaux
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1, RC2 and editor', Onaïa Savary, 15 Oct 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
805 | 57 | 16 | 878 | 39 | 49 |
- HTML: 805
- PDF: 57
- XML: 16
- Total: 878
- BibTeX: 39
- EndNote: 49
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1