Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3244
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3244
15 Jul 2025
 | 15 Jul 2025

Impacts of the Icelandic Holuhraun volcanic eruption on cloud properties using regional model cloud-aerosol simulations

Masaru Yoshioka, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Amy H. Peace, Jim M. Haywood, Ying Chen, and Paul R. Field

Abstract. Aerosol-cloud interactions remain a significant uncertainty in climate prediction, largely due to the complexity of measuring and modelling these processes. Volcanic eruptions, such as the Holuhraun event in 2014, offer valuable opportunities to study these interactions by introducing substantial aerosol perturbations. In this study, we investigate the impacts of the Icelandic Holuhraun volcanic eruption on cloud properties using the CASIM cloud microphysics model and the UKCA-GLOMAP aerosol microphysics model within the high-resolution regional model of the UK Met Office Unified Model.

For a four-week simulation, our findings indicate a more than 80 % increase in droplet number concentration during the eruption with reductions in cloud droplet sizes, both of which are statistically significant at 0.05 level in t-tests. In contrast, the effects of the volcanic eruption on liquid water path and cloud fraction are not generally significant. During the third week of September, neither satellite observations nor model simulations show significant impacts of the volcanic plume on cloud properties when comparing in-plume to out-of-plume properties. Our simulations suggest that the volcanic aerosol effect during this period was masked by factors affecting the out-of-plume atmospheric conditions, such as natural meteorological variability or non-volcanic aerosols possibly originating from Europe. When volcano on/off simulations are examined, the droplet number increase and the reduction in droplet size remain evident, indicating that these effects are still active. This highlights the crucial role of realistic models in revealing aerosol-cloud interactions that can be obscured in observations due to environmental/meteorological factors.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Masaru Yoshioka, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Amy H. Peace, Jim M. Haywood, Ying Chen, and Paul R. Field

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Masaru Yoshioka, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Amy H. Peace, Jim M. Haywood, Ying Chen, and Paul R. Field
Masaru Yoshioka, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Amy H. Peace, Jim M. Haywood, Ying Chen, and Paul R. Field

Viewed

Total article views: 377 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
306 56 15 377 18 10 20
  • HTML: 306
  • PDF: 56
  • XML: 15
  • Total: 377
  • Supplement: 18
  • BibTeX: 10
  • EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 364 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 364 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
We used advanced computer simulations to study how aerosol particles from a volcanic eruption in Iceland affected clouds. The eruption plume increased small droplets, but changes in cloud water and horizontal extent were not clear. Satellite comparisons between plume and non-plume regions can miss volcanic effects due to spatial variability in weather and aerosol, but simulations can isolate the impact by comparing cases with and without the eruption.
Share