the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Submesoscale horizontal stirring enhances seasonal enrichment of low-chlorophyll surface waters in the Eastern Mediterranean
Abstract. The large seasonal increase in marine photosynthetic organisms – i.e., phytoplankton bloom – is a ubiquitous oceanic phenomenon that contributes to the removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and that supports the growth and development of larger organisms throughout the marine ecosystem. The underlying mechanisms controlling the intensity and timing of these blooms have been proposed to be dominated by vertical transport and mixing processes that are enhanced at front and filament circulation patterns, commonly known as submesoscale currents. Here we show that the winter blooms characterizing the ultra oligotrophic waters of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, which are manifested by a seasonal increase in satellite-derived levels of surface chlorophyll, are intensified by enhanced horizontal stirring induced by the submesoscale currents. Using ocean color remote sensing data and high-resolution numerical simulations, we demonstrate that the intensification of submesoscale currents in winter efficiently connect the coastal waters and the ultra-oligotrophic waters in the sea interior, thereby enriching the latter with chlorophyll-rich water. A comparison of climatological chlorophyll time series indicates that this submesoscale horizontal stirring mechanism is responsible for ∼ 24 % of the seasonal surface chlorophyll increase in the region. These results shed new light on the processes governing phytoplankton bloom intensity and emphasize the important role of submesoscale horizontal stirring in regulating the marine ecosystem.
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3240', Alexandra Jones-Kellett, 23 Sep 2025
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yotam Fadida, 26 Oct 2025
Thank you very much for your detailed review and incredibly insightful recommendations. I will definitely implement most, if not all, of your suggestions; however, I think I should wait until I get the reviews from the referees and then work on the whole thing at once. I appreciate the time and effort you put into this analysis.
Kind Regards,
Yotam Fadida
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3240-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yotam Fadida, 26 Oct 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3240', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Nov 2025
Review of “Submesoscale horizontal stirring enhances seasonal enrichment of low-chlorophyll surface waters in the Eastern Mediterranean”
The authors present the role of lateral exchanges by sub-mesoscale instabilities in controlling the productivity of the interior of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. In contrast to previous studies, which have typically focussed on the vertical velocities, the authors focus on horizontal transports between the productive coastal and Nile outflow influenced regions and the oligotrophic interior. Overall, I found the paper convincing and worthy of publication in Ocean Science however I have a few suggestions below to improve the paper.
I found the structure of the manuscript inconsistent with Ocean Science style papers and made it (at times) not very smooth to read. I regularly found myself jumping from parts of section 2 to section 4 and appendix A in order to understand the model and data sets used. I would suggest restructuring so that the methods and content in appendix A come before the results. I would also suggest strengthening the methods with more discussion of the model, the inputs (river and topography seems like they would be very important for this but are not described in the paper) and its validation to provide confidence in the results.
I was a little confused around line 96 –97. If I understood this line correctly the model has a bio-geo-chemical component (e.g. the authors mention modelled nutrient gradients) but we are not shown any BGC results from the model. It would seem very important to see if the model used in the later analysis reproduces the satellite derived seasonal variability.
Fig 6 and the associated text is not really demonstrated in this work. If the point is to be made it should be tested in the paper. Would it be possible using the particle tracking experiment. Can you demonstrate that the particles are accumulating on fronts prior to leaving the boundary region? Then becoming more evenly distributed once further off shore?
Minor Comments
Line 10 to 11 > I don’t think that the statement about 24% of the winter enhancement being driven by sub-mesoscale motions is supported by the manuscript. The only reference I could find is that the eastern box has 24% higher chl than the western box in winter. It seems a bit of a jump to then state that this is (1) all driven by submesoscale flows and (2) imply it applies to the whole region.
Line 145 > Missing the “2)”
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3240-RC2
Viewed
Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,297 | 0 | 4 | 1,301 | 0 | 0 |
- HTML: 1,297
- PDF: 0
- XML: 4
- Total: 1,301
- BibTeX: 0
- EndNote: 0
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This article provides a compelling story of how coastal-to-offshore submesoscale stirring fuels the annual winter phytoplankton blooms in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. To do so, the authors examine the spatiotemporal submesoscale physics of a numerical model and compare the patterns with satellite chlorophyll observations. Overall, I enjoyed reading about this work and believe that it will be a good fit for Ocean Science after further revision.
The authors wrote the article in a letter-like format, which ultimately obscures some of the details. Since the manuscript was submitted as a “Research Article”, my recommendations are made with that in mind. As a reader, I was itching for more information about the model and Lagrangian particle tracking that was not provided until the very end in the Appendix. I believe the results would be better supported if Appendix A and the Methods Sections were combined and moved before the Results Section. Many of my other suggestions are for more methodological detail and quantitative statistics to be provided to support the findings. Please see the attached document for specific comments and technical corrections.