Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3217
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3217
24 Jul 2025
 | 24 Jul 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Simulating multivariate hazards with generative deep learning

Alison Peard, Yu Mo, and Jim W. Hall

Abstract. When natural hazards coincide or spread over large areas they can create major disasters. For accurate risk analysis, it is necessary to simulate many spatially resolved hazard events that capture the relationships between extreme variables, but this has proved challenging for conventional statistical methods. In this article, we show that deep generative models offer a powerful alternative method for creating sets of synthetic hazard events due to their ability to implicitly learn the joint distribution of high-dimensional data. Our framework combines generative adversarial networks with extreme value theory to construct a hybrid method that captures complex dependence structures in gridded multivariate weather data and provides a theoretical justification for extrapolation to new extremes. We apply our method to model the co-occurrence of strong winds, low pressure, and heavy precipitation during storms in the Bay of Bengal, demonstrating that our model learns the spatial and multivariate extremal dependence structures of the underlying data and captures the distribution of storm severities. Validation shows excellent preservation of spatial correlation structures (r = 0.977, MAE = 0.053) and multivariate dependencies (r = 0.817, MAE = 0.096) for wind, precipitation, and pressure fields. In a case study of storm risk to mangrove forests, we demonstrate that correctly modelling the dependence structures leads to far more realistic estimates of aggregate damages. While our method shows mild underestimation of the damages with a mean absolute error of 93.57 km2, this remains an order of magnitude lower than errors from independence assumptions (460.54 km2) and the total dependence assumption (1056.90 km2) that is implicit when using return period maps. The framework developed in this paper is flexible and applicable across a wide range of data regimes and hazard types.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Alison Peard, Yu Mo, and Jim W. Hall

Status: open (until 03 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3217', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Sep 2025 reply
Alison Peard, Yu Mo, and Jim W. Hall

Data sets

Code and data from paper: Simulating multivariate hazards with generative deep learning Alison Peard https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15838238

Model code and software

Code and data from paper: Simulating multivariate hazards with generative deep learning Alison Peard https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15838238

Alison Peard, Yu Mo, and Jim W. Hall

Viewed

Total article views: 628 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
538 80 10 628 63 17 15
  • HTML: 538
  • PDF: 80
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 628
  • Supplement: 63
  • BibTeX: 17
  • EndNote: 15
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 628 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 628 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
We developed a generative deep learning method combining generative adversarial networks and extreme value theory to simulate realistic multi-hazard events across large regions. Tested on Bay of Bengal storms, the model accurately captured spatial patterns of wind, pressure, and rainfall, providing more realistic disaster risk assessments than traditional methods. This flexible framework can be applied to various hazards and regions for improved disaster planning.
Share