Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3133
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3133
08 Jul 2025
 | 08 Jul 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Tree height uncertainty biases aboveground biomass estimation more than wood density in miombo woodlands

Arthur Mpazi Yambayamba, Ferdinand Handavu, Kondwani Kapinga, and Tommaso Jucker

Abstract. Accurate and unbiased estimation of tree aboveground biomass (AGB) is essential for large-scale monitoring of forest carbon stocks. But estimating AGB typically requires several data imputation steps that can introduce substantial errors that are hard to quantify and correct for. Two sources of uncertainty that are thought to be particularly important but remain poorly understood are tree height – which is generally estimated using allometric models – and wood density – which is most commonly assigned from databases based on taxonomic matching. Here, we used data from 154 destructively harvested trees in Zambia’s miombo woodlands that span a large range of sizes to develop a framework to partition errors in AGB arising from uncertainty in tree height and wood density. We found that when locally-calibrated allometries are used to estimate missing tree height information and when wood density is imputed from species-specific values derived from public databases, AGB can be estimated with high precision and little or no bias. However, when tree height and wood density are imputed more coarsely using generic information, errors in AGB can be substantial. In particular, estimating tree height using a regional allometric model developed for tropical dry forests led to 35 % underestimation of AGB. Our study provides an intuitive approach for quantifying and partitioning errors in AGB arising from uncertainty in tree height and wood density, paving the way for more robust mapping of forest carbon stocks and fluxes.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Arthur Mpazi Yambayamba, Ferdinand Handavu, Kondwani Kapinga, and Tommaso Jucker

Status: open (until 14 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3133', Sybryn Maes, 22 Jul 2025 reply
Arthur Mpazi Yambayamba, Ferdinand Handavu, Kondwani Kapinga, and Tommaso Jucker
Arthur Mpazi Yambayamba, Ferdinand Handavu, Kondwani Kapinga, and Tommaso Jucker

Viewed

Total article views: 282 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
228 43 11 282 8 5 14
  • HTML: 228
  • PDF: 43
  • XML: 11
  • Total: 282
  • Supplement: 8
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 14
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 288 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 288 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Trees contribute enormously to climate change mitigation by sequestering huge amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Quantifying this important function of trees is however not without challenges at it requires measuring the size and density of trees to determine aboveground biomass. Our study shows that uncertainty in tree size can lead to more errors than from density. Characterising local tree structures is key to our understanding of the contribution of trees to climate change mitigation.
Share