the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Crustal-upper mantle velocity structure from the North Qilian to Beishan block and the tectonic significance of the crustal deformation
Abstract. The Qilian Shan constitutes a Cenozoic fold-thrust belt characterized by multi-stage tectonic deformation since the Paleozoic era. The Hexi corridor basins and the Beishan block, located north of the Qilian Shan, are the southern segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. The crustal-mantle structure of the study area serves as a transition zone, crucial for comprehending the deep processes of accretion and crustal deformation. This study introduces a novel 460-km deep seismic sounding profile spanning the North Qilian Shan to the Beishan block. The P-wave velocity structure of the crust and upper mantle indicates a crustal thickness between 47.5 km and 60 km, segmented into five strata. The central Jiuquan basin displays the most substantial crust, measuring 59.5–60 km in thickness. The average crustal velocity varies between 6.24 and 6.43 km/s, while the Pn velocity ranges from 7.7 km/s to 8.1 km/s. The considerable variance in crustal velocity indicates heterogeneity in the crustal composition of the Qilian Shan and Beishan block. The southern edge fault of the Beishan block delineates the area, where northward and southward thrusting induces upper crustal deformation on opposing sides. The crust of the southern Beishan block is weaker than that of the bordering regions. Additionally, we propose a north-direction subduction polarity of the Qilian Ocean based on the northward-tilted velocity contour in Paleozoic.
- Preprint
(2556 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3096', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Aug 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3096/egusphere-2025-3096-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3096', Tao XU, 08 Aug 2025
This manuscript presents a detailed investigation of the crustal-upper mantle velocity structure across the North Qilian Shan to the Beishan block using a 460-km-long seismic wide-angle reflection/refraction profile. The study provides valuable insights into the tectonic evolution of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau and the southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB). The seismic profile is well-designed, and the processing techniques (e.g., phase identification, velocity modeling) are appropriately applied. The error analysis (e.g., RMS traveltime residuals) supports the reliability of the results. The proposed northward subduction polarity of the Qilian Ocean and the role of the southern Beishan boundary fault (F5) as a major strike-slip structure are significant contributions. The findings enhance understanding of crustal deformation mechanisms in the transition zone between the Tibetan Plateau and the CAOB. The data are robust, and the methodology is sound, but the manuscript requires improvements in clarity, interpretation, and presentation before it can be published finally:
Q1: Terminology Consistency: Use either "Beishan block" or "Beishan orogenic belt" consistently. Define abbreviations (e.g., PAO, CAOB) at first use.
Q2: In lines 33–34 of the introduction, the sentences are overly complex or ambiguous, a thorough language edit by a native English speaker is recommended.
Q3: For figure captions: Fig. 1: Add scale bars and clarify tectonic unit labels; Fig. 5-6: Improve visibility of velocity contours and annotations.
Q4:Compare results with existing seismic/gravity/MT studies (e.g., Cui et al., 1995; Xiao et al., 2017) to strengthen interpretations. Discuss potential biases (e.g., ray coverage gaps, trade-offs between velocity and interface depth)..
Q5: In the “Discussion” section, compare results with existing seismic/gravity/MT studies (e.g., Cui et al., 1995; Xiao et al., 2017) to strengthen interpretations. Provide more geological evidence (e.g., paleo-trench positions, slab remnants) to support the north-dipping Qilian Ocean model. .
Q6: Update citations (e.g., Wu et al., 2024; Xie et al., 2023; Yao et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2023) and include key regional studies (e.g., Zuza et al., 2019).
Detailed comments and corrections:
Line2 1-3: Crustal-Upper Mantle Velocity Structure From the North Qilian to Beishan Block: Tectonic Significance of Crustal Deformation
Line 4-10: Extra comma in address, such as change "Beijing, 10009, China" → "Beijing 10009, China"
Line 14: constitutes→ represents
Line 17: serves→ acts
Line 23: "considerable variance" → *"significant variations (6.24–6.43 km/s
Lines 35–36: As a transition zone between NE Tibet and CAOB, the crust-mantle structure records...
Line 43: "has witnessed" → "experienced"
Line 48: "Experiencing multi-stage breakup..." → "The block underwent multi-stage breakup..."
Line 138: "To make... clearer" → *"To enhance clarity, we bandpass-filtered (8 Hz)..."*
Line 141: "first arriving phase" → "first-arrival phase"
Line 179: "The base of interface C1 corresponds..." → "Interface C1 marks the basement (3.4–6.5 km/s)..."
Line 202: Qilian and the Jiuquan basin" → "Qilian Shan and Jiuquan Basin"
Line 257-258: "are with negative" → "show negative"
Line 259: "which are prevented by" → "which terminate at"
Line 264: "dives northward" → "extends northward"
Line 267: "C1and C3" → "C1 and C3"
Line 313: "Our data demonstrates" → "Our data demonstrate"
Line 315: "We speculate that" → "We interpret this as"
Line 338: could represent" → "likely represents".
Line 345: "regarded as the youngest uplifted Mts." → "considered the most recently uplifted mountains"
Line 347: "by a series" → "through a series"
Line 381: "was playing the function" → "functioned as"
Line 399: "with the highest height" → "with the highest elevation"
Line 402: "is grouped" → "can be divided"
Line 406: "(3) Subduction..." → "Third, subduction..."
Line 408: "(4) Bounded by..." → "Fourth, the F5 fault demarcates..."
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3096-CC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3096', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Aug 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3096/egusphere-2025-3096-RC2-supplement.pdf
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
466 | 18 | 11 | 495 | 47 | 46 |
- HTML: 466
- PDF: 18
- XML: 11
- Total: 495
- BibTeX: 47
- EndNote: 46
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1