Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3070
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3070
11 Jul 2025
 | 11 Jul 2025

Plasma Density Estimation from Ionograms and Geophysical Parameters with Deep Learning

Kian Sartipzadeh, Andreas Kvammen, Björn Gustavsson, Njål Gulbrandsen, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Devin Huyghebaert, and Juha Vierinen

Abstract. Accurate estimates of the ionospheric electron density are essential for various space-weather applications but are especially challenging at high latitudes due to strong spatial and temporal variability driven by auroral precipitation and complex ionospheric convection. This study presents an assimilative empirical model designed to improve regional electron-density estimates in Northern Scandinavia. The model uses ionogram images, the local magnetic field, the auroral electrojet, the ring current and solar-activity indices as inputs. These inputs are fused by a multimodal neural network and trained with incoherent-scatter-radar (ISR) observations of electron density profiles as the target. The model remains functional with only a subset of input, leading to a modest accuracy degradation. Comparative analysis demonstrates that our neural-network–based assimilative model outperforms the ARTIST 4.5 ionogram scaler and the state-of-the-art E-CHAIM model, especially during auroral activity. Overall, our model achieves an R2 score of 0.74 on an independent test dataset, whereas ARTIST 4.5 and E-CHAIM obtain R2 values of –0.08 and 0.34, respectively. These results indicate that the model can provide reliable, continuous electron-density estimates at high latitudes, even under auroral conditions. This methodology can be extended to develop empirical ionospheric models for other regions with historical ISR data and to invert ionograms to electron-density profiles when ISR observations are unavailable. A similar approach could also be applied in short-term forecasting of the ionospheric electron density.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Kian Sartipzadeh, Andreas Kvammen, Björn Gustavsson, Njål Gulbrandsen, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Devin Huyghebaert, and Juha Vierinen

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3070', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Aug 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3070', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Aug 2025
Kian Sartipzadeh, Andreas Kvammen, Björn Gustavsson, Njål Gulbrandsen, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Devin Huyghebaert, and Juha Vierinen
Kian Sartipzadeh, Andreas Kvammen, Björn Gustavsson, Njål Gulbrandsen, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Devin Huyghebaert, and Juha Vierinen

Viewed

Total article views: 1,133 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,077 49 7 1,133 71 69
  • HTML: 1,077
  • PDF: 49
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 1,133
  • BibTeX: 71
  • EndNote: 69
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,131 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,131 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Knowing charged particle densities high above Earth is key for forecasting space weather effects on satellites and communications, but they are difficult to estimate at high latitudes because of auroras. We built an artificial intelligence model for northern Norway using radar observations, magnetic field measurements, geophysical indices and solar activity. It produces more accurate estimates than existing methods, even during auroral events, and can be adapted to other regions.
Share