the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Long-term impacts of mixotrophy on ocean carbon storage: insights from a 10,000-year global model simulation
Abstract. Mixotrophs — organisms that combine the use of light and inorganic resources with the ingestion of prey — have been shown in simulations to increase mean organism size and carbon export. These simulations have, however, been limited to decade-long timescales that are insufficient to investigate the impacts of mixotrophy on the ocean's long-term capacity for carbon storage. Here we explore these long-term impacts using a low-resolution ocean model that resolves important feedbacks between surface ecology and the ocean interior over multi-millennial periods. The model was compared in two configurations: one with a strict distinction between phytoplankton and zooplankton populations and one in which all populations were assumed to be capable of mixotrophy. Consistent with earlier studies, we found that increased carbon and nutrient export associated with mixotrophy was rapidly established within the first few years of the simulation and robust over long time scales. However, we also found that these increases were partially offset over longer time scales by a decline in dissolved inorganic carbon and nutrients entering the deep ocean via the sinking of surface waters. Over the 10,000 year duration of the simulations, we found that ecologically-driven changes in C export increased the oceanic C inventory by up to 626 Pg, and that this was partially offset by decline of 149 Pg in the preformed C inventory, leaving a net increase of up to 477 Pg C (1.3 %).
- Preprint
(4078 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 24 Sep 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-3050', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Aug 2025
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3050/egusphere-2025-3050-RC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-3050-RC1 -
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Sep 2025
reply
This paper extends previous modeling work by Ward and Follows, in order to examine whether effects of mixotrophy on ocean biogeochemistry are robust over long timescales. Overall the work is a useful contribution to biogeochemical modeling and mixotrophy research, and the manuscript is clearly written. I have a few minor suggestions that may help clarify the results and their interpretation.
The details of the ecological model are summarized very briefly, because the model was described in a previous publication. However, there are some details that are important when trying to understand the model outcomes, which I think should be included in this manuscript. Specifically:
-How does export flux work? Is there a relationship between organism size and sinking rate? Is there sinking of detrital particles? Is there any particle aggregation?
-How does cellular stoichiometry work? Is stoichiometry fixed or flexible?
-How many potentially limiting nutrients are tracked and included when modeling growth rates (e.g., N, P, Fe)?
The authors focus on gradients of DIC and phosphate, and never discuss nitrate. Is there a reason for this? Do the phosphate and nitrate patterns tell the same story? Nitrogen limits phytoplankton growth more commonly than phosphorus, so it seems important to have some discussion of nitrate.
The authors interpret the effects of mixotrophy on phosphate in high latitude regions in terms of iron limitation. Specifically, their hypothesis is that mixotrophy alleviates iron limitation, leading to greater phosphate drawdown. This is an interesting idea that would benefit from some more exploration. Which regions of the ocean are iron-limited in this model? And is there more evidence from the model output, such as the growth limitation terms, that can shed light on whether mixotrophy alters iron limitation?
The Sensitivity to Tradeoffs section belongs in the results section, not the discussion.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3050-RC2
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Sep 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
721 | 30 | 9 | 760 | 19 | 24 |
- HTML: 721
- PDF: 30
- XML: 9
- Total: 760
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1