the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Modeling the combined effects of the 2023 Türkiye-Syria Earthquake and an Atmospheric River event on landslide hazard
Abstract. This study investigates the landslide hazards resulting from the compound effects of the February 6, 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquakes and a subsequent atmospheric river (AR) event that delivered up to 183 mm of rainfall across the earthquake-impacted region. Using the open-source Landlab modeling toolkit, we integrate global satellite datasets to simulate shallow landslide hazard at a regional scale. Our landslide hazard model incorporates earthquake legacy effects, a seismic driver accounting for post-seismic hillslope weakening, and rainfall drivers into a probabilistic implementation of the infinite slope stability theorem through a Monte Carlo approach. Model validation using landslide inventories and satellite-derived surface change metrics confirms improved performance for rainfall-driven landslide hazards when legacy effects are included. The legacy model reveals an approximately 13° reduction in critical slope angle and identifies high-hazard zones consistent with observed and inferred failures. Additionally, we analyze how the sequence of extreme seismic and rainfall events influences landslide hazard. We find that the scenario where the AR event precedes the earthquakes produces the greatest hazard, with median critical slopes up to 7° lower than other models in high-probability bins (probability of failure, P(F) > 0.6) and nearly double the number of grid cells exceeding P(F) > 0.8 compared to the next closest scenario. We demonstrate how using historical extreme rainfall records can effectively replicate post-seismic landslide hazard maps that use real-time data, offering a rapid approach for hazard forecasting in tectonically active and climate-sensitive regions.
- Preprint
(7781 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 14 Aug 2025)
-
RC1: 'Reviewer Comment (minor revisions) on egusphere-2025-3011', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Jul 2025
reply
I've read with interest this manuscript that presents an evaluation of the combined role of rainfall and earthquakes on landslides, using case studies in Türkiye.
My overall comment is very positive, since I've found the paper clear, well-written, with a good structure and useful figures and tables. Perhaps, the lenght of the mansucript could be shortened a bit to improve its readability. I've only a few comments mostly regarding the landslide probability assessment and the construction of the landslide inventory and landslide absence data needed for the analysis.
In my opinion, the manuscript can be accepted subject to minor revisions. I list my comments below:
Overall, I've found some confusion with the use of landslide "hazard" and "susceptibility" terms. I'd suggest checking the whole text and avoiding misuses of these terms.
Was the Montecarlo approach used in Landlab LandslideProbability component somehow constrained considering the ranges of parameters typical of the study area?
Was the landslide inventory somehow validated in the field? I'm asking this given that the event is relatively recent.
How was the slope threshold of 15° used to filter out landslides (line 285) selected?
Regarding the sampling of non-landslide grid cells, why an equal number of landslide and non-landslide grid cells was selected? I wonder if it would have been better to select a larger number of non-landslide cells than the same number of landslide inventory cells. This is a common approach in such types of analyses.
Line 385: Please add here details on the temporal resolution of the IMERG data used.
Line 419: Please add here details on how the return period of the rainfall was calculated
Some technical suggestions for the figures:
Figs 1 and 2. An inset with the location of the study area would be useful
Figs. 3-4. Please add details on the reference system (e.g. EPSG) of the maps
Fig. 6. Please check the readability of the text in panels c and d. Moreover, please define all variables in the caption (nnl and nl are missing)
That's all from me. Best regards!
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3011-RC1
Data sets
Copernicus DEM GLO-30: Global 30m Digital Elevation Model Copernicus https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/COPERNICUS_DEM_GLO30
GPM: Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Release 07 NASA GES DISC at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/NASA_GPM_L3_IMERG_V07
Harmonized Sentinel-2 MSI: MultiSpectral Instrument, Level-2A (SR) Copernicus https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/COPERNICUS_S2_SR_HARMONIZED
MCD15A3H.061 MODIS Leaf Area Index/FPAR 4-Day Global 500m NASA LP DAAC at the USGS EROS Center https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/MODIS_061_MCD15A3H
ERA5 Daily Aggregates - Latest Climate Reanalysis Produced by ECMWF / Copernicus Climate Change Service ECMWF/Copernicus https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/ECMWF_ERA5_DAILY
SPL4SMGP.007 SMAP L4 Global 3-hourly 9-km Surface and Root Zone Soil Moisture NASA/NSIDC https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/NASA_SMAP_SPL4SMGP_007
Sentinel-2 Land Use/Land Cover Esri/Copernicus https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/landcoverexplorer/#mapCenter=-95.81944%2C29.68916%2C11&mode=step&timeExtent=2017%2C2024&year=2024
SoilGrids250m 2017-03 - Absolute depth to bedrock ISRIC https://data.isric.org/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/f36117ea-9be5-4afd-bb7d-7a3e77bf392a
HiHydroSoil v2.0: Global Maps of Soil Hydraulic Properties at 250m Resolution FutureWater https://www.futurewater.eu/projects/hihydrosoil/
M 7.8 - Pazarcik earthquake, Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence PGA USGS https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000jllz/shakemap/pga
M 7.5 - Elbistan earthquake, Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence PGA USGS https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000jlqa/shakemap/intensity
Model code and software
Landlab SoilMoisture Component Sai Nudurupati and Erkan Istanbulluoglu https://github.com/landlab/landlab/tree/master/src/landlab/components/soil_moisture
Landlab LandslideProbability Component Ronda Strauch, Erkan Istanbulluoglu, and Sai Nudurupati https://github.com/landlab/landlab/tree/master/src/landlab/components/landslides
Interactive computing environment
Legacy_effects_landslide_probability Hunter Jimenez https://github.com/HunterJimenez/pub_EGU_Landlab_LS
Event_sequence_landslide_probability Hunter Jimenez https://github.com/HunterJimenez/pub_EGU_Landlab_LS
Soil_moisture_dynamics Hunter Jimenez https://github.com/HunterJimenez/pub_EGU_Landlab_LS
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
110 | 8 | 5 | 123 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 110
- PDF: 8
- XML: 5
- Total: 123
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1