A data-driven method for identifying climate drivers of agricultural yield failure from daily weather data
Abstract. Climate-related impacts, such as agricultural yield failure, often occur in response to a range of specific weather conditions taking place across different time periods, such as during the growing season. Identifying which weather conditions and timings are most strongly associated with a certain impact is difficult because of the overwhelming number of possible predictor combinations from different aggregation periods. Here we address this challenge and introduce a method for identifying a small number of climate drivers of an impact from high-resolution meteorological data. Based on the principle that causal drivers should generalize across different environments, our proposed two-stage approach systematically generates, tests, and discards candidate features using machine learning and then generates a set of robust drivers. We evaluate the method using simulated US maize yield data from two process-based global gridded crop models and rigorous out-of-sample testing (using approximately 30 years of early 20th-century climate and yield data for training and over 70 years of subsequent data for testing). The climate drivers identified align with crop model mechanisms and consistently use only the weather variables that are taken as input by the respective models. Logistic regression models using ten drivers as predictors show strong predictive performance on the held-out test period even under shifting climatic conditions, achieving correlations of 0.70–0.85 between predicted and true annual proportions of grid cells experiencing yield failure. This approach circumvents the limitations of post-hoc interpretability in black-box machine learning models, allowing researchers to use parsimonious statistical models to explore relationships between climate and impacts, while still harnessing the predictive power of high-resolution, multivariate weather data. We demonstrate this method in the context of agricultural yield failure, but it is also applicable for studying other climate-related impacts such as forest die-off, wildfire incidents, landslides, or flooding.
Competing interests: One of the (co-)authors, Christoph Müller, is a member of the editorial board of Geoscientific Model Development.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
To get access to the data sources necessary to replicate your work, you have linked webpages that do not comply with our policy, such as the ISIMIP site, the USDA NASS and http://prism.oregonstate.edu. These are not suitable repositories for scientific publication, and because of it your manuscript should not have been accepted for Discussions or peer-review in our journal. Therefore, the current situation with your manuscript is irregular. Please, publish your data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible, as we can not accept manuscripts in Discussions that do not comply with our policy.
Also, you must include a modified 'Code and Data Availability' section in a potentially reviewed manuscript, containing the information of the new repositories.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot accept your manuscript for publication in our journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor