Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-287
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-287
28 Feb 2025
 | 28 Feb 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Ideas and Perspectives: Potentially Large but Highly Uncertain Greenhouse Gas Emissions Resulting from Peat Erosion

Thomas C. Parker, Chris Evans, Martin G. Evans, Miriam Glendell, Richard Grayson, Joseph Holden, Changjia Li, Pengfei Li, and Rebekka R. E. Artz

Abstract. Peatland erosion and resulting particulate organic carbon (POC) flux is an international problem that is causing loss of peat carbon to the atmosphere and contributing to climate change. Peatlands from around the world are eroding and losing carbon for a range of reasons, from overgrazing to climate change, and the POC is subsequently exposed to a diverse range of conditions, depending on the geographical context. The context, drivers of erosion and downstream environment will directly influence the rate at which POC is mineralised to CO2 by microbial communities. Despite the potential large carbon losses from POC and subsequent CO2 emissions the mechanisms for emissions reporting at international and national level are undeveloped. Here we highlight the key limitations for understanding and quantifying emissions that result from peat erosion and discuss the research that is required to address these limitations. We particularly consider quantification of direct CO2 emissions from bare peat and resedimentation and further turnover at different scales. By integrating biological and geomorphological process understanding we can work towards better quantification of peatland emissions and the emissions that can be avoided through peatland ecosystem restoration.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Thomas C. Parker, Chris Evans, Martin G. Evans, Miriam Glendell, Richard Grayson, Joseph Holden, Changjia Li, Pengfei Li, and Rebekka R. E. Artz

Status: open (until 22 Apr 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Thomas C. Parker, Chris Evans, Martin G. Evans, Miriam Glendell, Richard Grayson, Joseph Holden, Changjia Li, Pengfei Li, and Rebekka R. E. Artz
Thomas C. Parker, Chris Evans, Martin G. Evans, Miriam Glendell, Richard Grayson, Joseph Holden, Changjia Li, Pengfei Li, and Rebekka R. E. Artz

Viewed

Total article views: 102 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
74 23 5 102 2 3
  • HTML: 74
  • PDF: 23
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 102
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 117 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 117 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
Many peatlands around the world are eroding and causing carbon losses to the atmosphere and to freshwater systems. To accurately report emissions from peatlands we need to understand how much of the eroded peat is converted to CO2 once exposed to the atmosphere. We need more direct measurements of this process and a better understanding of the environmental conditions that peat is exposed to after it erodes. This information will help quantify the emissions savings from peatland restoration.
Share