Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2869
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2869
02 Jul 2025
 | 02 Jul 2025

Spatializing Net Ecosystem Exchange in the Brazilian Amazon biome using the JULES model and vegetation properties

Amauri C. Prudente Junior, Luiz A. T. Machado, Felipe S. Silva, Tercio Ambrizzi, Paulo Artaxo, Santiago Botia, Luan P. Cordeiro, Cleo Q. Dias Junior, Edmilson Freitas, Demerval S. Moreira, Christopher Pöhlker, Ivan M. C. Toro, Xiyan Xu, and Luciana V. Rizzo

Abstract. The large extension and diversity of the Brazilian Amazon biome hampers the assessment of regional-scale carbon budget based solely on local observations. Considering the shortage of observations, this study aims to examine the carbon fluxes throughout the Brazilian Amazon biome using the process-based model (JULES, Joint UK land environment simulator). A sensitivity analysis detected five critical model parameters for the Amazon tropical broadleaf evergreen forest, optimized using carbon flux and meteorological data from four forest sites. The simulations with new parametrization were compared to JULES default parameter values and with simulations of the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM). Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and gross primary production (GPP) estimates were improved at all sites, reaching a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) about 30 % lower in comparison to the default version. The optimized parameter values varied among the four sites, indicating that a single parameterization for the whole Amazonia may not be adequate. JULES model parameters were extrapolated for the Brazilian Amazonia, based on canopy height and leaf area index gridded data. Applying JULES with spatial dependent parameterization for the year of 2021 resulted in a carbon sink of -1.34 Pg C year-1. Regional differences were observed in the carbon fluxes, with a carbon source of 0.75x10-12 Pg C m-2 year-1 in the southwest and north, likely explained by increased ecosystem respiration in older and taller forests.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Amauri C. Prudente Junior, Luiz A. T. Machado, Felipe S. Silva, Tercio Ambrizzi, Paulo Artaxo, Santiago Botia, Luan P. Cordeiro, Cleo Q. Dias Junior, Edmilson Freitas, Demerval S. Moreira, Christopher Pöhlker, Ivan M. C. Toro, Xiyan Xu, and Luciana V. Rizzo

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2869', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jul 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2869', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Aug 2025
Amauri C. Prudente Junior, Luiz A. T. Machado, Felipe S. Silva, Tercio Ambrizzi, Paulo Artaxo, Santiago Botia, Luan P. Cordeiro, Cleo Q. Dias Junior, Edmilson Freitas, Demerval S. Moreira, Christopher Pöhlker, Ivan M. C. Toro, Xiyan Xu, and Luciana V. Rizzo
Amauri C. Prudente Junior, Luiz A. T. Machado, Felipe S. Silva, Tercio Ambrizzi, Paulo Artaxo, Santiago Botia, Luan P. Cordeiro, Cleo Q. Dias Junior, Edmilson Freitas, Demerval S. Moreira, Christopher Pöhlker, Ivan M. C. Toro, Xiyan Xu, and Luciana V. Rizzo

Viewed

Total article views: 280 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
238 29 13 280 19 8 18
  • HTML: 238
  • PDF: 29
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 280
  • Supplement: 19
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 18
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 280 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 280 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 30 Aug 2025
Download
Short summary
This study propoes a new method of spatialization to estimate carbon fluxes in the Brazilian Amazon biome. To do so, was used a land surface model (JULES) and two vegetation properties. The results of this spatialization resulted in a carbon fluxes of -1.34 Pg C during the year of 2021 in the entire Brazilian Amazon biome being the states of Amapa and Acre main relevant regions of carbon source.
Share