the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Multiproxy analyses of multiple firn cores from coastal Adélie Land covering the last 40 years
Abstract. Water stable isotope signals recorded in shallow firn cores are essential to constrain the variations of climate and atmospheric water cycle over the past decades to centuries. However, deposition and post-deposition effects add additional signal, often referred to as stratigraphic noise, to the isotopic signal. One way to reduce the local stratigraphic noise is to combine several firn cores at the same location.
Here, we study the water isotopic composition and chemical records from 9 firn cores (20 to 40 m depth) drilled in 2016 at 3 sites (D47, Stop5 and Stop0) with high accumulation rates (~200 mm w.eq ·yr-1) along a transect between the coast and the plateau in Adélie Land in Antarctica (100 to 385 km from the coastal station Dumont d’Urville). Each core covers at least the period from 1979 to 2016 and the high-resolution measurements permit to capture the seasonal variations in both chemical and isotopic records. At each site, similarities in the nssSO4 and δ18O variations between the different cores were used to combine the three isotopic records into a single stacked isotopic curve, thereby enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio. At two sites, we find a good agreement when comparing the water isotopic profiles recovered from the stacked records to those obtained as modeling output from virtual firn cores calculated using the two isotope-enabled atmospheric general circulation models, ECHAM6-wiso and LMDZ6iso over the period 1979–2016. At the very windy site of D47, building a coherent signal from the 3 individual cores is not possible because the isotopic and impurities signals are much more affected by stratigraphic noise. This study confirms that, even if the benefit of stacking is limited at very windy sites, combining several cores is of primary importance to faithfully reconstruct water isotope variability at one site and further investigate how much climate signal is actually preserved in coastal cores.
- Preprint
(2560 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1425 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2863', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Nov 2025 reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 886 | 49 | 22 | 957 | 30 | 28 | 34 |
- HTML: 886
- PDF: 49
- XML: 22
- Total: 957
- Supplement: 30
- BibTeX: 28
- EndNote: 34
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The paper by Tcheng et al. is reporting an in-depth analysis of the isotopic composition of individual and stacked records from firn cores (a total of 9 cores) collected at three sites in a coastal area of Adelie Land in Antarctica. These sites are characterized by a relatively high snow accumulation rate allowing, through a continuous flow analysis method, to obtain high resolution d18O records along with nssSO4 profiles. These high-resolution records allow a very precise dating, at least for the two sites named Stop5 and Stop0. All the cores exhibit seasonal variations but at the D47 site the strong katabatic winds are strongly affecting the isotopic records. A stacking record, obtained for each of the three sites, permits to reduce the stratigraphic noise and is then compared to a Virtual Firn Core (VFC) calculated using two isotopic GCMs, ECHAM6 and LMDZ6, over a common period 1979-2016. The two less disturbed sites show consistent seasonal variability as the VFC records, allowing to observe common trends in d18O. This study, through a very detailed analysis if the high-res records, demonstrate the difficulty in obtaining a clear link between temperature and d18O, particularly in those sites that may be disturbed by redistribution processes by winds, as is the case for D47.
The paper is original and novel in the sense it uses a very detailed isotopic and chemical records for obtaining a climate reconstruction to be comparable to the climate data obtained from isotopic models. The data are well presented and discussed, and I have found the reading quite smooth although some parts could be reduced a little.
I recommend its publication after the authors have been considered to the following minor comments.
I have a general comment: why not attempting to calculate mean annual d18O values to be compared to VFC data and ERA5 precipitation weighted data? This could bring some information to eventual the d18O/T sensitivity at interannual scale. Has this been done or at least checked?
The title: I would suggest changing “covering the last 40 years” since it is misleading, they are not the last 40 years…
Page 2, line 1: “ … closely linked to …. ice mass loss …”
Page 2, line29: may you specify “long-term” how many years it is?
Page 7, line 147: may you add which is the period covered?
Page 10, line 232: all the nssSO4 profiles feature common patterns. However, If I am looking at figure 2 the sulphate records at Stop5 are not so similar….
Page 10, lines 248-249: the Pinatubo signal: I agree with the authors that it is quite ambiguous, but if I am looking at the figure S5 the signal is well evident at Stop0 (stacked profile).
Page 13, Table 3 and also in the text to be specified if the data regarding the snow accumulation from stake is referring to a mean value obtained from a stake farm or is one single stake value and which density values have been used and to which year is referred.
Page 18, figure 5: If I am looking at the records from Stop5 I found very different trends and patterns between staked records and VFC ones, around 1990 +/-3 years. May you comment on this? Perhaps are you referring at this point at page 19 lines 392-393? Add in the text.
Page 20, lines 411-413: may you explain better for the reader how the local roughness is calculated. There is an explanation in the table caption, but I would suggest you move it to the main text.
Page 20, lines 427-429: see my previous comment above (figure5).
Please, change in all the figures (text and supplementary) the X axis title and labels from mm to m.
Please check all the delta symbols in the text.
Please check all the table format.
In the Supplementary: the caption of figure S5 is referring to which core site? Stop0?
Is the code for calculating the VFC records free available?