the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A lesson in preparedness: Assessing the effectiveness of low-cost post-wildfire flood protection measures for the catastrophic flood in Kineta, Greece
Abstract. Climate change–driven wildfires, especially in the Mediterranean, are not only becoming more frequent and severe but also amplifying flood risks by altering catchment hydrology. Yet, post-fire flood risk management remains inadequately addressed. In response, we develop an integrated simulation framework that combines meteorological, hydrological, hydraulic-hydrodynamic models and remote sensing techniques to represent post-wildfire flood hazards and support the design of Post-wildfire Flood Protection Treatments (PFPTs). We utilize the framework to accurately represent a post-wildfire flash flood event in a Mediterranean catchment in Greece. The flood event is simulated under three scenarios: pre-wildfire, post-wildfire without any PFPTs in place (reality), and post-wildfire with PFPTs. The results show that the wildfire's impact on flood extent was around a 24.1 % increase, but the PFPTs could have counterbalanced this impact. Moreover, we present an economic model for estimating the cost of the recommended PFPTs and the flood damage direct costs, combining an accounting and a semi-automated AI-based approach. The cost comparison reveals that the protection would have cost around € 3.45 mill (just the 13.7 % of the flood damage costs, € 25.2 mill) potentially saving € 6.37 mill in flood damage. By filling critical knowledge gaps, our study offers insights into the dynamics of post-wildfire flood events and provides policymakers with valuable insights for timely risk mitigation amidst escalating fire-related disasters.
- Preprint
(2869 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3234 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2834', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Dec 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2834', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 Dec 2025
General comments
This preprint addresses a clearly relevant hydrological risk question for HESS: how wildfire-induced landscape change modulates subsequent flood hazard, and how post-wildfire flood protection treatments (PFPTs) might reduce impacts in a real Mediterranean setting. The manuscript is generally well written, easy to follow, and the end-to-end workflow is communicated in a logical sequence (meteorology → RS → hydraulics → PFPT design → economics). The work’s main novel contribution is not one single model component, but the integration of: (i) storm reconstruction with WRF-ARW, (ii) Sentinel-2–based burn severity characterization and flood extent mapping for validation, (iii) 2D HEC-RAS rain-on-grid hydrodynamic simulation, (iv) explicit spatial design and terrain-level insertion of PFPTs (LEBs and WCDs) to test counterfactual scenarios, and (v) a cost comparison that contrasts PFPT implementation costs with direct flood-damage costs. I also consider the economic layer to be a strong and relatively uncommon addition in post-fire flood studies. The manuscript quantifies PFPT costs (≈€3.45M) and compares them to direct damages (≈€25.2M), using Greek techno-economic specifications for the PFPT bill of quantities and a semi-automated exposure counting approach (SAM + manual checking) for damage estimation. Overall, I see this as a solid contribution with tangible operational value (scenario-based preparedness planning), provided that several methodological and traceability elements are clarified to strengthen reproducibility and to better constrain uncertainty.
Specific comments:While the main elements of the hydraulic setup are described in the text, it would be useful to add a compact table (main text or Supplement) summarising the key HEC-RAS Rain-on-Grid configuration (computational grid/mesh resolution, numerical time step, boundary conditions, rainfall forcing input format, representation of bridges/culverts), including a brief note on how the “blockage” condition is parameterised in the “reality” scenario. This modest addition would materially improve traceability and reproducibility.
The results indicate not only changes in flooded extent, but also clear differences in flow depth and velocity between scenarios. A slightly stronger emphasis on these aspects in the Discussion could further support the interpretation of the mitigation benefits, given their direct relevance to damage severity and hazard intensity.
Technical corrections:
The manuscript uses both “burnt” and “burned” to describe post-fire conditions. Although both forms are correct in English, it would improve stylistic coherence to choose one and use it consistently throughout the text.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2834-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 947 | 151 | 31 | 1,129 | 80 | 27 | 37 |
- HTML: 947
- PDF: 151
- XML: 31
- Total: 1,129
- Supplement: 80
- BibTeX: 27
- EndNote: 37
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear Editor
I have finished my review on the proposed paper “A lesson in preparedness: Assessing the effectiveness of low-cost post-wildfire flood protection measures for the catastrophic flood in Kineta, Greece".
In the proposed paper, the authors’ goal is to develop an integrated simulation framework that combines meteorological, hydrological, hydraulic hydrodynamic models and remote sensing techniques to represent post-wildfire flood hazards and support the design of Post wildfire Flood Protection Treatments (PFPTs).
Also, I provide a pdf file with more specific comments.