the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Numerical Simulation of a Severe Blowing Snow Event over the Prydz Bay Region
Abstract. Blowing snow in Antarctica is a critical process regulating ice sheet mass balance. Using the CRYOWRF real-time atmosphere-snow surface coupling model, this study simulates a severe wind and blowing snow event that occurred near Zhongshan Station, East Antarctica, from 15 to 17 July 2022. Triggered by a mid-latitude cyclone, the event was characterized by distinct local atmospheric dynamics influenced by terrain forcing and katabatic winds. Specifically, enhanced katabatic winds induced an atmospheric hydraulic jump at the ice shelf edge before the cyclone’s warm front arrival, resulting in subsidence adiabatic warming that formed a local warm pool along the eastern coast of Prydz Bay. The cyclone driven strong winds not only exacerbated blowing snow but also triggered intense snowfall on windward slopes, where the snowfall mixed with blowing snow to form snowstorms. As the cyclone entered its terminal phase, the model-simulated wind speed decrease aligned with observations, which should have led to a reduction in blowing snow. However, field observations revealed that blowing snow persisted. Snowfall from the cyclone’ s shallow cold front made a significant contribution to maintaining this persistent blowing snow. These results highlight the complex interactions between synoptic-scale systems and local topography, emphasizing the importance of more accurate simulations in elucidating the intricate dynamics of Antarctic local weather processes.
- Preprint
(51569 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2718', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Oct 2025
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2718/egusphere-2025-2718-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2718', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2718/egusphere-2025-2718-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2718/egusphere-2025-2718-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2718', Michael Lehning, 10 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2718/egusphere-2025-2718-RC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2718/egusphere-2025-2718-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2718', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Oct 2025
Numerical Simulation of a Severe Blowing Snow Event over the Prydz Bay Region
The article focuses on a cyclonic event in the Prydz Bay Region of Antarctica. The article is nicely structured, and it includes nice results explaining the influence of cyclone on the snowfall and blowing snow. The article uses non-hydrostatic model CRYOWRF to understand the phenomenon which is a welcome step in understanding the Antarctic phenomenon especially katabatic winds and blowing snow.
My major comment is that while the authors mention that the focus of the paper is on the blowing snow, the paper is actually more about the cyclonic event but rather blowing snow feels like a small part of the paper.
- And discussion section reads like a repetition of the results section which is already quite extensive.
- The authors only briefly touch upon different sensitivity studies (with and without blowing snow) (lines 660 – 711), but do not discuss in detail what is the effect on local meteorology. What would actually make the paper more interesting and more relevant to understanding blowing snow, and also increase the value of the paper is if the authors focused more on the effect of blowing snow on katabatic wind, previous studies (e.g. Kodama et al. (1985)) indicate that blowing snow increases the Katabatic force. With previous RCM simulations it has been difficult to resolve this phenomenon, with the current setup used by the authors it is possible to have a look at the effect of blowing snow on the katabatic force and other meteorological variables. Adding this analysis would actually improve the quality of the paper and also allows us to generalize some ideas.
- The paper in the current state is too long and the sensitivity studies with respect to blowing snow is overlooked which could add important insights and of possible value to the community.
After these revisions the paper can be reconsidered for publication.
Minor comments
- Line 47 – It profoundly affects almost every ‘link’ in the Antarctic cryosphere? What do you mean by ‘link’?
- Line 66 – Which study? Rephrase this sentence.
- Introduction could be shortened and more streamlined
- Line 186: What is etc? Please mention all the variables relevant to the paper that are measured.
- Line 181: Which automatic weather station is this? What are the specifications? Please include some details.
- Line 211: Please add appropriate reference
- Line 231: Typically WRF nested domain grid ratios are either 3 or 5. So in this case it should have been: 12, 4, and 1.3 km. Is there any effect of choice of 1km on the results?
- Fig 2: Latitude and Longitude replot them in white color so they are visible. It is very difficult to find the coordinates with the current figure
- Fig 2: Please include a separator between date and time to avoid confusion
- Line 307: Please include statistical values when mentioning ‘good agreement’ with the observations, a visual match is not enough. From Figure 3(a) it seems the observed windspeed during the peak of the event could be more than 10 m/s compared to simulations
- Line 375: Fig 5d
Reference:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/annals-of-glaciology/article/effect-of-blowing-snow-on-katabatic-winds-in-antarctica/C64D9FE1D932CBA050FE74B73AB7333A
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2718-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2718/egusphere-2025-2718-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2718', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2718/egusphere-2025-2718-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2718/egusphere-2025-2718-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2718', Michael Lehning, 10 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2718/egusphere-2025-2718-RC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2718/egusphere-2025-2718-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Xiaoqiao Wang, 21 Nov 2025
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,539 | 165 | 42 | 1,746 | 62 | 64 |
- HTML: 1,539
- PDF: 165
- XML: 42
- Total: 1,746
- BibTeX: 62
- EndNote: 64
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Numerical Simulation of a Severe Blowing Snow Event over the Prydz Bay Region
The article focuses on a cyclonic event in the Prydz Bay Region of Antarctica. The article is nicely structured, and it includes nice results explaining the influence of cyclone on the snowfall and blowing snow. The article uses non-hydrostatic model CRYOWRF to understand the phenomenon which is a welcome step in understanding the Antarctic phenomenon especially katabatic winds and blowing snow.
My major comment is that while the authors mention that the focus of the paper is on the blowing snow, the paper is actually more about the cyclonic event but rather blowing snow feels like a small part of the paper.
After these revisions the paper can be reconsidered for publication.
Minor comments
Reference:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/annals-of-glaciology/article/effect-of-blowing-snow-on-katabatic-winds-in-antarctica/C64D9FE1D932CBA050FE74B73AB7333A