Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2700
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2700
01 Jul 2025
 | 01 Jul 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

Digging Deeper: Assessing Soil Quality in a Diversity of Conservation Agriculture Practices

Manon S. Ferdinand, Brieuc F. Hardy, and Philippe V. Baret

Abstract. Conservation Agriculture (CA) aims to enhance soil quality through three main principles: minimizing mechanical soil disturbance, maximizing soil organic cover, and diversifying crop species. However, the diversity of practices within CA makes the effect on soil quality hardly predictable. In this study, an evaluation of soil quality in CA fields across Wallonia (Belgium) was conducted for four distinct CA-types. Three soil quality indicators were examined: the soil structural stability, the soil organic carbon:clay ratio (SOC:Clay), and the labile carbon fraction (POXC). Results revealed significant variations among CA-types. The CA-type characterized by substantial temporary grassland and tillage-extensive crops (e.g., cereals, meslin, rape, flax) in the crop sequence had the highest soil structural stability and SOC:Clay ratio. In contrast, the CA-type characterized by strict non-inversion tillage practices and frequent tillage-intensive crops (e.g., sugar beet, chicory, potatoes, carrots) had the lowest scores for the three indicators. Temporary grassland in the crop sequence appeared as the most influential factor improving soil quality. These findings highlight the need to consider the diversity of CA-type when evaluating the agronomic and environmental performance of CA systems, whose response depends on local soil and climatic conditions, the crops cultivated, and the specific combination of practices implemented.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Manon S. Ferdinand, Brieuc F. Hardy, and Philippe V. Baret

Status: open (until 12 Aug 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Manon S. Ferdinand, Brieuc F. Hardy, and Philippe V. Baret
Manon S. Ferdinand, Brieuc F. Hardy, and Philippe V. Baret

Viewed

Total article views: 89 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
73 12 4 89 7 4 3
  • HTML: 73
  • PDF: 12
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 89
  • Supplement: 7
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 89 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 89 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
We assessed three soil quality indicators across Walloon Conservation Agriculture (CA) fields, accounting for practice diversity within four CA-types. Soil indicators varied significantly among CA-types. Inclusion of temporary grasslands in the crop sequence emerged as the most influential factor. Our findings show that CA effects depend on the combination of practices, highlighting the need for a systemic, context-based evaluation of soil quality.
Share