the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Rossby wave resonance for idealized jets on a beta-plane
Abstract. This paper analyzes Rossby wave resonance along a circumglobal midlatitude jet in the framework of the linearized inviscid barotropic vorticity equation on a zonally periodic beta-plane. Zonally symmetric Gaussian-shaped westery jets of varying amplitude and width are specified as basic states. The system is forced by pseudo-orography which varies sinusoidally in the zonal direction and which has a small meridional extent. Stationary solutions are obtained through straightforward numerical methods. The strength of resonant amplification is diagnosed by systematically varying the zonal wavenumber s, plotting the resulting wave amplitude as a function of s, and quantifying the sharpness of its peak (if existent). The numerical solutions for jet-like basic states are interpreted by reference to analytical solutions obtained for more idealized model configurations.
The analysis indicates that a jet with realistic amplitude and width may be subject to a weak form of resonance. Given that the zonal scale of a jet is much larger than its meridional scale, one may expect resonance at no more than one zonal wavenumber sres. This resonant peak is associated with the first meridional mode, which is established through partial reflection of wave activity at the periphery of the jet flanks. The fact that a jet acts like a leaky waveguide implies that the wave amplitude remains finite even right at the resonant wavenumber. The behavior is very similar as in the classic Charney-Eliassen model, where the channel width must be chosen appropriately and where damping simulates the leakiness of the jet.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Weather and Climate Dynamics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(9528 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2508', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Sep 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2508', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Nov 2025
I enjoyed reading this paper; it presents a thorough pedagogical exposition of Rossby wave resonance in a orographically perturbed linearised barotropic vorticity equation.
As far as I could see there are no technical issues with the paper, the literature is appropriately referenced for a non-review paper, and the exposition is clear, if a bit longwinded. From that point of view, the article could be accepted as is, subject to some minor technical corrections, and I would be quite happy for this to be the outcome of the review process.
I must admit I have a problem with the manuscript, which the Editor is free to ignore if they think this does not represent a serious enough issue.
Firstly, I was not immediately struck by the originality, surprise, or novelty of the results. It seems to be a bit of an exercise in relatively straightforward applied mathematics with some linear model well-explored. It is then not so clear to me what I really did learn from the manuscript that I did not already know or could guess. It clearly does add colour and detail to our understanding of the forced, linearised barotropic vorticity equation applied in a beta-channel setting, but I am rather less convinced it actually helps us understand the atmosphere any better.
The authors point out some of the caveats of the setup, but I might add some further caveats: the BVE is linearised, but partial wave reflection at a jet edge in any dynamical setting would be accompanied by nonlinear filamentation. The authors point out that the jet is considered zonally symmetric but the real jet is importantly deformed by the nonlinear planetary waves that the paper is about. The detailed nature of the boundary conditions is important, but in reality this would vary on the zonal scale of the planetary waves themselves. The atmosphere is not barotropic, and would, at the least, involve a finite Rossby radius; after all, the compression of the column by the orography is the key forcing mechanism. Any nonlinearity would immediately introduce wave-wave interactions in which case the whole spectrum of the forcing becomes important. I am sure that further analyses could address some, perhaps all of these caveats, but that is not done in the present manuscript. The detailed results in the manuscript seem at face value strongly dependant on the rather strongly simplifying assumptions in the setup, but these same assumptions move the model quite far away from the observed atmosphere.
In summary, the details resulting from the analysis of a model with so many idealisations probably have rather limited applicability to the real atmosphere: which of your detailed conclusions would stand up to more realism?
If the idealised model actually solves a question we had about planetary waves then we learned something about the atmosphere using the model, but I do not believe that is the case in the present manuscript; at least that is not what is presented. As it stands the model analysis appears to just answer detailed questions about the model.
Would this type of analysis perhaps be better suited for an applied mathematics journal?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2508-RC2 -
EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2508', Sebastian Schemm, 04 Nov 2025
Dear Authors,
We have now received two reviews of your manuscript. In light of these and based on my own assessment, I would like to invite you to prepare your responses to both reviews. Please address in particular the comments made by reviewer no. 2 regarding the degree of novelty.
From a scientific perspective, I would like you to consider the following for your discussion. As you increase the sharpness of the jet, there is a possibility of it becoming barotropically unstable. In such cases, seeking stationary solutions may not be meaningful.
Best wishes,
Sebastian SchemmCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2508-EC1
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 828 | 62 | 19 | 909 | 47 | 52 |
- HTML: 828
- PDF: 62
- XML: 19
- Total: 909
- BibTeX: 47
- EndNote: 52
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Overall, this paper can be considered a companion to Harnik and Wirth (2025). While Harnik and Wirth (2025) focused on obtaining solutions for a leaky waveguide, and the effects of a leaky waveguide are somewhat analogous to wave damping, the present paper emphasizes the features of Rossby wave resonance. The authors provide a thorough review of the historical context of Rossby wave resonance in the literature, return to the linear barotropic model with pseudo-topography as forcing, derive analytical solutions, and present corresponding numerical solutions. This study suggests that, under realistic conditions, the only possible resonance solution within a linear framework corresponds to the first meridional mode.
It is a pleasure to review this paper. The main body of the manuscript is well-written and clear. I have only a few minor comments and suggestions:
Minor comments:
Overall, I found this paper to be well-structured, informative, and a valuable contribution to the literature on Rossby wave resonance. I hope the paper can be published soon.