Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2475
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2475
10 Jul 2025
 | 10 Jul 2025

The spatial distribution of convective precipitation – an evaluation of cloud microphysics schemes with polarimetric radar observations

Gregor Köcher and Tobias Zinner

Abstract. The representation of cloud microphysics in numerical weather prediction models contributes significantly to the uncertainty of weather forecasts. Polarimetric radar observations are increasingly used to evaluate numerical weather simulations, due to their sensitivity to microphysical properties. Typically, this evaluation is performed for individual case studies, which limits the generalizability of the results. This is particularly problematic for convective precipitation events, which are characterized by high variability due to their small scale and rapid error growth of initial uncertainties, and are often associated with severe weather phenomena. In this study, the performance of microphysics schemes in the simulation of convective precipitation events is evaluated statistically over a 30-day dataset. The aim is to assess the distribution of precipitation into convective and stratiform regions, and the microphysical properties in these regions based on polarimetric radar signals. Within a Weather Research and Forecasting model setup, 5 different microphysics schemes of varying complexity are evaluated. The choice of microphysics schemes has a significant impact on the distribution of precipitation; the median convective area fraction varies by an order of magnitude between the microphysics schemes. These differences are attributed to differences in rain drop size distributions. In the convective core, the FSBM and Morrison schemes frequently lack large rain drops, while the Thompson and P3 schemes simulate too many. Statistical evaluations are important to address the prevailing uncertainty surrounding cloud microphysics. The framework presented in this study can serve as a guide for future statistical evaluations of weather models with polarimetric radar observations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Gregor Köcher and Tobias Zinner

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2475', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Aug 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2475', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Aug 2025
Gregor Köcher and Tobias Zinner

Data sets

A gridded 30-Day dataset of convective precipitation from radar and WRF simulations with 5 microphysics schemes Gregor Köcher https://opendata.physik.lmu.de/2rvyDFh8t2W4QNX/

Convection-permitting WRF simulations with 5 microphysics schemes over 30 days Gregor Köcher https://opendata.physik.lmu.de/gmjQaVOkkmbQCqC/

Model code and software

Software for data analysis Gregor Köcher https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15519860

Gregor Köcher and Tobias Zinner

Viewed

Total article views: 799 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
742 43 14 799 19 25
  • HTML: 742
  • PDF: 43
  • XML: 14
  • Total: 799
  • BibTeX: 19
  • EndNote: 25
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 797 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 797 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 11 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Simulations of convective precipitation events with microphysics schemes of varying complexity are statistically evaluated against polarimetric radar observations. Convective precipitation is potentially hazardous and difficult to predict. Cloud microphysics schemes contribute significantly to this uncertainty. Depending on the microphysics used, the simulated precipitation distribution varies significantly. The main reason for these differences are the underlying rain drop size distributions.
Share