Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2315
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2315
23 Jun 2025
 | 23 Jun 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Quantifying and attributing the role of anthropogenic climate change in industrial-era retreat of Pine Island Glacier

Alexander T. Bradley, David T. Bett, C. Rosie Williams, Robert J. Arthern, Paul R. Holland, James Bryne, and Tamsin L. Edwards

Abstract. The West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) has undergone rapid change over the satellite era, characterized by significant thinning, grounding line retreat, and mass loss. Over one-third of the ice loss from this region is from Pine Island Glacier (PIG). However, robust causal links between anthropogenic climate change and PIG ice loss have yet to be established. Here, we quantify the role of anthropogenic climate change in observed retreat of PIG over the 20th century and how this may evolve up to 2200. To do so, we use an ensemble Kalman inversion data assimilation method embedded into the calibrate-emulate-sample (CES) uncertainty quantification framework. This procedure yields observationally constrained probability distributions of both model and climate forcing parameters. Our analysis suggest that it is unlikely that the extent of 20th century PIG retreat would have taken place without anthropogenically driven trends in ice-sheet forcing and that anthropogenic forcing exacerbated the extent of PIG retreat over the 20th century, by approximately 18%. We also find significant retreat even with no anthropogenic trends in forcing, potentially highlighting the role of ice-sheet memory associated with long, slow retreat over the Holocene in controlling present retreat of the WAIS. We further find that significant anthropogenic signals in climate forcing only emerge in the middle of the 22nd century. An important caveat to this work is our choice of initial state, which is larger than expected in practice and may render the anthropogenic forcing contribution in our simulations to be smaller than it is in practice.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Alexander T. Bradley, David T. Bett, C. Rosie Williams, Robert J. Arthern, Paul R. Holland, James Bryne, and Tamsin L. Edwards

Status: open (until 04 Aug 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Alexander T. Bradley, David T. Bett, C. Rosie Williams, Robert J. Arthern, Paul R. Holland, James Bryne, and Tamsin L. Edwards
Alexander T. Bradley, David T. Bett, C. Rosie Williams, Robert J. Arthern, Paul R. Holland, James Bryne, and Tamsin L. Edwards

Viewed

Total article views: 165 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
108 54 3 165 3 3
  • HTML: 108
  • PDF: 54
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 165
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 162 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 162 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 07 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
At least since we started measuring in detail, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet has lost a lot of ice, but we don't know if climate change is responsible. In this work, we put a number on the role of climate change in retreat of a glacier in this ice sheet, for the first time. We show that climate change made the shrinking of this glacier much worse. Our work also suggests that what happened on very long timescales (the last 10,000 years) might also matter for retreat of the ice sheets today.
Share