the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A radar view of ice microphysics and turbulence in Arctic stratiform cloud systems
Abstract. Ice microphysical processes are inherently complex because of their sensitivity to temperature and humidity, the diversity of ice crystal habits, and their interaction with supercooled liquid water (SCL) and turbulence. Long-term surface-based radar observations have been systematically used to unravel the different processes that affect ice particle growth. In this study, we present a statistical analysis of 6.5 years of Ka-band radar observations, combined with thermodynamic profiles derived from radiosonde measurements. For the first time, ice particle growth and sublimation—diagnosed from vertical gradients of radar reflectivity and mean Doppler velocity—are systematically mapped across a broad range of temperature and moisture conditions. These vertical gradients correspond closely with saturation levels relative to ice and exhibit a strong temperature dependence in supersaturated regions. Notably, distinct signatures near -15 °C are indicative of dendritic growth. Turbulence, quantified via the eddy dissipation rate (EDR), is most frequently observed in regions containing SCL. When SCL is located near cloud base, it often appears decoupled from high EDR values, suggesting that latent heat release from SCL alone is insufficient to generate strong turbulence. Instead, the presence of turbulence appears to actively support the formation and maintenance of SCL. The co-occurrence of SCL and elevated turbulence results in significantly enhanced ice particle growth compared to conditions in which either is present alone.
This work provides new observational constraints that are critical for improving the representation of ice microphysics in atmospheric models.
- Preprint
(2351 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 15 Jul 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2149', Peter May, 15 Jun 2025
reply
This paper analyses a large volume of K-band radar data from the North Slope of Alaska ARM site and uses novel statistical methods to infer some key ice microphysical processes from the data. This is well within the scope of ACP and these broad statistical studies are to be encouraged. The analysis appears quite robust and I think this manuscript should be published with relatively minor edits. I also suggest that some discussion is made on the potential use of longer wavelength data given the quite large number of Microwave Rain Radars operating at high latitudes. For scatter from ice particles there should not be too much sensitivity.
There are a couple of gaps in the discussion. The introduction of Z being proportional to the sixth power of D is true for Rayleigh scatter, but scattering from ice crystals is much more complex with dependencies on shape, density and how much air is trapped than such a simple relation. There is an excellent discussion in Chapter 3 by Tynelä et al in the recent book, Volume 2 of Advances in Weather Radar edited by V.N Bringi, K.V. Mishra and M. Thurai. Likewise, the variations in(reflectivity weighted) fall speed for different crystals and the impact of this on the discussion and interpretation needs some further discussion. This discussion goes back a long way, at least to Locatelli and Hobbs (JGR, 1974). This is mentioned in the latter part of the manuscript, but again needs some more detail and nuancing.
The discussion on EDR retrievals also needs further explanation and what equations are being used? It is certainly different from spectral width based estimates. What is the confidence in these retrievals?
How robust is the “detection” of SCL? For samples where you argue that there is SCL near cloudbase, have you validated with lidar data? This would give more confidence to the conclusions. I certainly wouldn’t expect that turbulence contributes to the formation of SCL. In contrast, I thought it would increase collision rates and riming.
Minor comments:
Do you make a density correction for the fallspeeds? This will be needed for more quantitative discussion.
The colorscale of Fig 1, panel b should be changed so that detail between 0 and 1 m/s is more clearly visible.
Overall ratings:
Scientific significance: Excellent
Scientific quality: Good
Presentation quality: Good to excellent
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2149-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
134 | 31 | 5 | 170 | 6 | 7 |
- HTML: 134
- PDF: 31
- XML: 5
- Total: 170
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1