the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to model crevasse initiation? Lessons from the artificial drainage of a water-filled cavity on the Tête Rousse Glacier (Mont Blanc range, France)
Abstract. Crevasses play a crucial role in glacier-related hazards by facilitating water intrusion into the ice body and potentially triggering the collapse of large ice masses. However, the stress conditions governing their initiation and propagation remain uncertain. In particular, there is ongoing debate regarding the most relevant stress invariants to define fracture initiation (the failure criterion) and the corresponding failure strength, i.e. the stress threshold beyond which crevasses form. Laboratory estimates are hampered by the difficulty of reproducing natural glacier conditions, while in situ studies encounter uncertainties when converting strain or strain rate into stress estimates. This study investigates crevasse initiation processes by analyzing the artificial drainage of a water-filled cavity on Tête Rousse Glacier in 2010. Using the finite element code Elmer/Ice, we simulate the drainage and subsequent cavity refilling over three consecutive years. Given the well-constrained cavity geometry and water levels, stress fields are inferred directly from the force balance, removing the need to convert deformation data into stress estimates. Simulated stress distributions are compared with a pattern of circular crevasses mapped around the cavity after the first drainage event. Our results suggest that crevasse initiation is best explained by assuming a non-linear viscous mechanical response of ice (Glen's flow law, n = 3), rather than a linear viscous or linear elastic response. Additionally, by evaluating four failure criteria commonly used in glaciology, we show that the maximum principal stress criterion, with a stress threshold of 100 to 130 kPa, provides the best match to the observed crevasse field.
- Preprint
(8728 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3896 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2137', Sarah Wells-Moran, 22 Jul 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2137/egusphere-2025-2137-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-2137-RC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Julien Brondex, 12 Nov 2025
We would like to thank Sarah Wells-Moran for her careful reading of our paper and for her insightful comments. We apologize for the delay in providing this reply, which is due to the additional viscoelastic simulations we performed following the suggestion from Lizz Ultee. Our detailed responses are provided in the first part of the attached document.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Julien Brondex, 12 Nov 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2137', Lizz Ultee, 24 Jul 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-2137/egusphere-2025-2137-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Julien Brondex, 12 Nov 2025
We would like to thank Lizz Ultee for her careful reading of our paper and for her insightful comments. We apologize for the delay in providing this reply, which is due to the additional viscoelastic simulations we performed following the reviewer’s suggestion. Our detailed responses are provided in the second part of the attached document.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Julien Brondex, 12 Nov 2025
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 792 | 51 | 19 | 862 | 38 | 19 | 38 |
- HTML: 792
- PDF: 51
- XML: 19
- Total: 862
- Supplement: 38
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 38
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1