the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Impact of rainfall variability on sedimentary and hydropower dynamics in a dam reservoir of southern France
Abstract. Hydropower is the leading renewable energy source, but its vulnerability to environmental pressures remains a critical concern, particularly under climate change. While climate impacts on hydropower are well studied, the interplay between precipitation variability, sediment dynamics, and dam operation strategies has received comparatively less attention. This study investigates these interactions in the French Mediterranean region, focusing on the Mont d’Orb dam reservoir. An integrated approach was adopted, combining (1) sediment core analysis using fallout radionuclide dating to assess the impact of extreme rainfall on sediment yield; (2) statistical analysis of meteorological records to detect long-term trends and seasonal shifts; and (3) hydrological and operational data analysis to evaluate how sedimentation, precipitation variability, and reservoir management influence hydropower generation. Results show that extreme rainfall events (top 1 %) contribute disproportionately—20–50 %—to the annual sediment delivery. Although annual precipitation has not significantly changed since 1950, a clear seasonal shift from winter- to fall-dominant precipitation emerged. This change is driven by a significant increase in fall event frequency (+87 % to +400 % for 100 to 150 mm/day thresholds) and intensity (+31 %), alongside a -20 % decrease in winter precipitation, which is key to reservoir recharge. During thefirst two management periods, hydropower generation was more impacted by multipurpose dam objectives (e.g.,flood control, water supply) than by direct climatic forcing. A high sedimentation rate of 19.3 mm/year was observed. While sedimentation did not directly affect electricity production yet, it poses long-term risks to storage capacity and turbine functioning. Hydropower output declined by 25 % between 1976–1997 and 2006–2022, underlining the growing sensitivity of hydropower to hydroclimatic constraints. Thesefindings highlight the need to better anticipate future environmental impacts in the context of rising electricity demand and climate uncertainty.
- Preprint
(3094 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(28574 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2127', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Jul 2025
This paper investigates the interplay of rainfall, water level management, and sedimentary infill variability on the operational dynamics of a dam reservoir in southern France. The authors employ a multi-faceted approach, combining analyses of sediment cores, precipitation data, and hydropower variations. Their research highlights significant alterations in the regional rainfall regime over recent decades, particularly a marked increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme events during winter and fall. These climatic shifts are associated with elevated sedimentation rates and a reduction in hydropower generation.
The findings of this study are particularly pertinent, offering a substantial contribution to understanding contemporary challenges related to the evolution of hydropower production and, more generally, reservoir functionality throughout the 21st century. The paper is commendably robust in its methodology, data analysis, and structural organization. The application of the MAR approach for this purpose, alongside other rigorous statistical analyses of temporal data, is especially valuable. The cross-referencing of sediment core data with time series measurements represents a particularly intricate and well-executed aspect of the research.
My comments are primarily minor and pertain to formatting. I encourage the authors to undertake a detailed proofreading to rectify small inconsistencies such as "Fig.??" (§ 430) and to ensure consistent formulations, for example, with phrases like "5 presents…" (§ 365). Furthermore, subsection 4.2 would benefit from a more comprehensive explanation of the 137Cs peak attribution. The reported dating of the Chernobyl peak at 1989, based on the calculated age-model, introduces some ambiguity; a clearer exposition of how this aligns with the model's inherent uncertainty would enhance clarity.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2127-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Paul Hazet, 05 Sep 2025
We are grateful to the reviewer for taking the time to evaluate our manuscript.
We provided a reply to his/her general comments in the attached file.
We hope to have the opportunity to submit a revised version of the manuscript taking these comments into account in the near future.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Paul Hazet, 05 Sep 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2127', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Aug 2025
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Paul Hazet, 05 Sep 2025
We are grateful to the reviewer for taking the time to evaluate our manuscript.
We provided a reply to his/her general comments in the attached file.
We hope to have the opportunity to submit a revised version of the manuscript taking these comments into account in the near future.We can provide the graphs along with a revised version of the manuscript if we are allowed to do so by the editor.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Paul Hazet, 05 Sep 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
312 | 30 | 14 | 356 | 61 | 8 | 24 |
- HTML: 312
- PDF: 30
- XML: 14
- Total: 356
- Supplement: 61
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1